Soldato
- Joined
- 4 Aug 2007
- Posts
- 22,022
- Location
- Wilds of suffolk
[TW]Fox;21512094 said:Its not the aim but it is the end result.
Its just not though we had this debate a few pages back
[TW]Fox;21512094 said:Its not the aim but it is the end result.
The trouble with the area concept is that it will be based on say the North East. In that area there are people living in rural areas with a high cost of living and should if it was done fairly be given a pay rise.
The highest costs of living are found in the Islands around Britain due to lack of housing(therefore very expensive), low pay and high costs to get goods.
Welcome to the private sector
And I am pretty sure there are "rich" people who get sick of going to work to fund the Jeremy Kyle brigade.
People actually voted Lib dem last election....
If I did...I would be furious
Gladly I used my brain
50p cut is likely to be going in because it's both ineffective and very unfair. Stepped tax bands in general are highly unfair, but the 50p rate is driven by jealousy rather than any sort of fiscal justification.
Exactly.
Look at the large civil service prescence on the Fylde coast - there are areas round here that have house prices that will make your eyes water:-
Why? The top 1% pay far too much tax as it is. High earners already pay more tax anyway because they earn more, so it utterly retarded to make them pay a higher percentage as well.
but as we have seen, many of those have managed to fudge it all with director loans and all manner of BS to avoid the tax.
"High earners already pay more tax anyway because they earn more" - yet middle earners are expected to contribute more at the expense of the super rich?
This I didn't know, but adds to the fuel that housing cost alone should not dictate high wages for public sector workers. I would also add that travelling costs in most cases is cheaper in London too, the average underground travel card is £50 a week, whereas someone living in a rural area would have to travel further to their place of work, in some cases public transport not even being an option, so that £50 a week wouldn't get you very far...
Am I the only one that doesn't get the hype and attraction around London? Yes, it's a world capital. But it has terrible crime, overpriced houses and awful areas such as Croydon/Peckham etc.
I would rather live in Lancaster. Cheap compared to the south, very pretty, next to the Lake District, next to no crime and also less arrogant southerners. With regards to housing, you have your standard terraced 3 bedroom properties right up to the 10 bedroom millionaire pads.
/troll
But in general (green grocers, restaurants, cafes), it costs a lot more.
On average, fuel is more expensive in London than out. To say otherwise is stupid.
That depends on the zones you cross, and Londoners need to use the underground more frequently than your metro (per capita).
Still not as expensive and London, and you're still wrong![]()
£3.45 for a pint of Stella here in my local (hence why I dont go there anymore) in rural lincolnshire.
How does that compare to a normal pub in London? (Not including the West end or Bond St where I paid £5 for a half 10 years ago!) Just a normal pub in a normal suburb.
£3.45 for a pint of Stella here in my local (hence why I dont go there anymore) in rural lincolnshire.
£3.45 for a pint of Stella here in my local (hence why I dont go there anymore) in rural lincolnshire.
How does that compare to a normal pub in London? (Not including the West end or Bond St where I paid £5 for a half 10 years ago!) Just a normal pub in a normal suburb.
You're talking to someone who has lived in and around Leeds for 20 years, Bristol for 4 years and London for 1. I've got a good feelhave you been north of watford lately? every time im in london everything is around the same price. restaurants, drinks etc. if you go to posh places you cant compare them to the cheaper places up north. compare like for like. bistro for bistro, cheap pub for cheap pub.
Interesting this was the area I alluded to earlier. The other significant main employer in the area blames the civil service for the high wages and the locals I know say people want to work at one of those two places due to higher wages.
Without the civil service being in the area I suspect the house prices would be significantly more attractive, bar the ones particularly well placed for the golf course![]()