You never do lol, that 990x is a beast! Wonder how brave Andy is feeling
Well, it really depends weather he paid for it with his own money, or it's a cherry picked off of the shelf at the shop for him lol
The CustomPC Media Benchmarking Suite
- Thread starter BioVirus87
- Start date
Well, it really depends weather he paid for it with his own money, or it's a cherry picked off of the shelf at the shop for him lol
Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 5,266
- Location
- London
Am getting stable now at 5.5ghz, up from my no#2 positioned 5.1ghz run (2771 points) and intend to smash those 990's
Am getting stable now at 5.5ghz, up from my no#2 positioned 5.1ghz run (2771 points) and intend to smash those 990's
At 5.5ghz my score was lower than 5ghz
Am getting stable now at 5.5ghz, up from my no#2 positioned 5.1ghz run (2771 points) and intend to smash those 990's
Andy m8 it looks like d_b has declared all out war on you with your 990x, show him you got Big Kahuna's-
As Scotty would say " l Andy she'll take a bit more"
Or Will It Be -
Apocalypse Now "I love the smell of a fried Chip in the morning"
You never do lol, that 990x is a beast! Wonder how brave Andy is feeling
I feel like benching
nice work kitfit1......whats your full spec (RAM etc).
ineresting that my 200BLCK was slower than your lower with higher multi
nice work kitfit1......whats your full spec (RAM etc).
ineresting that my 200BLCK was slower than your lower with higher multi
Thanks Andy.
If by full spec you mean hardware:
Classified E760
990x
G Skill Perfect Storm
Asus 5970
If you mean, what were the settings
that's for me to know and you to find out 
what RAM and speed mate.
This is an open hearted thread mate....we've all posted full specs and even pic.
I'm on an R2E so your classified settings will be of no use to me whatsoever bud
My RAM is elpida hyper dominator GT 2000 7,8,7,20 running at that with 200BLCK
you use 160 ish Block abd 31 multi which should mean you have almost 25% less memory bandwidth than me
This is an open hearted thread mate....we've all posted full specs and even pic.
I'm on an R2E so your classified settings will be of no use to me whatsoever bud
My RAM is elpida hyper dominator GT 2000 7,8,7,20 running at that with 200BLCK
you use 160 ish Block abd 31 multi which should mean you have almost 25% less memory bandwidth than me
This is gonna be interesting, some very impressive scores and clocks being posted guys.
+1 Yes, its been a very brillient thread, dead freindly, a good laugh, and both AMD and Intel have been taking there Cpu's to the limit.
Good Show Everyone Keep It Up.
OLDPHART.
Only messing with you guys
Ram was 969mhz 8-8-8-21-59
Yes it was under phase.
It was at 5ghz because as i said earlier, 5.5ghz ended up with a lower score.
I think the main reason my score beat yours Andy was because of running on the 2-12 divider but running the ram set to auto on the 1067 MCH strap.
I think it pulls all the subtimings down very very tight. BCLK never really has made the big difference that peeps think does.
Ram was 969mhz 8-8-8-21-59
Yes it was under phase.
It was at 5ghz because as i said earlier, 5.5ghz ended up with a lower score.
I think the main reason my score beat yours Andy was because of running on the 2-12 divider but running the ram set to auto on the 1067 MCH strap.
I think it pulls all the subtimings down very very tight. BCLK never really has made the big difference that peeps think does.
+1 Yes, its been a very brillient thread, dead freindly, a good laugh, and both AMD and Intel have been taking there Cpu's to the limit.
Good Show Everyone Keep It Up.
OLDPHART.
Agreed! Well played to all .....Gentleman....its been a pleasure serving with you all
(presses F10 and smashes 990X in at 5.4GHz/ 1.582V and prays for lack of burning smell)
Only messing with you guys
Ram was 969mhz 8-8-8-21-59
Yes it was under phase.
It was at 5ghz because as i said earlier, 5.5ghz ended up with a lower score.
I think the main reason my score beat yours Andy was because of running on the 2-12 divider but running the ram set to auto on the 1067 MCH strap.
I think it pulls all the subtimings down very very tight. BCLK never really has made the big difference that peeps think does.
Interesting....cheers matey....confirmed as I thought. Just benched at 5.4GHz and scored 25 points less.
OFF TO THE BIOS!!!
Yep, unlike the graphics forum, gets very heated in there at times.+1 Yes, its been a very brillient thread, dead freindly, a good laugh, and both AMD and Intel have been taking there Cpu's to the limit.
Good Show Everyone Keep It Up.
OLDPHART.
May the force be with you m8.OFF TO THE BIOS!!!
Mine was 28 points less at 5.5ghz.
Back from the BIOS
BSOD tastic.
written off as a bad job for tonight......my pit is calling
Great to see some fresh fellow loons joining the thread So.....who's gonna update the spreadsheet of scores (see OP) ???
Night all....be back tomorrow evening for more silicon abuse
BSOD tastic.
written off as a bad job for tonight......my pit is calling
Great to see some fresh fellow loons joining the thread
So.....who's gonna update the spreadsheet of scores (see OP) ???Night all....be back tomorrow evening for more silicon abuse
Yep, unlike the graphics forum, gets very heated in there at times.
May the force be with you m8.
lol - yeah, the graphics forum doesn't half need a reality check sometimes
they get SO worked up sometimes over the favourite brand (although i shouldn't complain......I work in distribution for Nvidia
)
Soldato
- Joined
- 20 Jul 2009
- Posts
- 4,821
- Location
- The bleak North East arm pit of Britain
Hmmm...
I wonder if the 920 can topple position 1...
I smell a challenge
I wonder if the 920 can topple position 1...
I smell a challenge