Well yes that is how viewing figures work, if enough of you who are supposedly repulsed by her actions turned off then she would soon change.Well that would make a big difference to her behaviour, little old me turning over.
Well yes that is how viewing figures work, if enough of you who are supposedly repulsed by her actions turned off then she would soon change.Well that would make a big difference to her behaviour, little old me turning over.
No i don't, but...they had a diving 'team' (not just one person), with a high tech scanning hardware. Yes they didn't search the fringes of the river, but surely then the police would have been wading the fringes methodically? So I really do think in a river that size, with that resource, they should have found her sooner.I don't think you understand anything about searching a river. I don't blame you, this expert has got people believing if you don't find people within the hour then they arent there...
Confirmed it's her then, thought it might have taken a bit longer.
Depending on what condition her body was in a familial ID may have been possible quickly. Fingerprint and dental records won't have taken much longer.
There's only an 'interest' in the local area.
No i don't, but...
The thing is if it isn't confirmed as suicide then there is rightly a public interest if a killer is on the loose.
Oh ok then shall we treat literally every death as a possible serial killing with this much 'public interest'?No not really, unless it turns out that it was a serial killer linked to other murders in the same area. People have cars and use them or public transport, they're not confined to a single area.
The thing is if it isn't confirmed as suicide then there is rightly a public interest if a killer is on the loose.
They search the area, the body moves into said area with the movement of water. It's not exactly an outlandish theory to me.No i don't, but...they had a diving 'team' (not just one person), with a high tech scanning hardware. Yes they didn't search the fringes of the river, but surely then the police would have been wading the fringes methodically? So I really do think in a river that size, with that resource, they should have found her sooner.
Check TikTok, i'm sure someone on there has the answer.
The police couldn't possibly be trusted to mention it if they had reason to suspect there was a 'killer on the loose'.
Please just stop.
Oh ok then shall we treat literally every death as a possible serial killing with this much 'public interest'?
Christ, imagine having to be the family member to carry out the ID.Depending on what condition her body was in a familial ID may have been possible quickly.
Until the outcome is known then there is a public interest in case it does turn out to be foul play, just as in any other death that hasn't yet been explained.
No you're right, the next Dahmer is probably hiding in the bushes, waiting to try and sous vide another innocent dog walker in broad daylightThey wouldn't know would they until the PM is completed.
I presume that, they would have revealed if it looked like murder soon after recovering the body. The Coroner will do the analysis of course, but at a guess it just looks like she took her own life to me.Will we get to find out if it was a suicide or not?
There's nothing to stop. Until it's been clarified there is rightly a public interest since whatever happened took place in a public place.