And half his head. Lol.
I can't see that but this is simply offside. I didn't even need the lines for that.
And half his head. Lol.
There was a potential offside in the run-up to a try in the Leicester v Quins game today. Referee thought it was OK on-field.
Video referee asked to check it. It was incredibly close, could have gone either way.....but because rugby has a sensible set of laws, the try was allowed, because the video referee has to see a clear and obvious error in order to overturn the on-field decision.
It's not rocket science. Catch the glaring errors, don't kill off the excitement and atmosphere.
Oh, he's still the same. I saw this on twitter the other day:Great goal to win a final.
Always found Rodgers irritating at Liverpool, but I quite like him nowadays.
It's the correct decision, I'm not sure what the issue is to be honest. At the end of the day it's there to correct errors...it corrected an error.
I'd rather have goals disallowed following a set of rules than whether a ref feels like disallowing it personally. What happens then when one ref lets a goal happen and another the next week doesn't?
Can we stop using "clear and obvious" when it comes to offsides. Ive lot count how many times people have said that doesn't come in here. He's half a yard offside.
You mean like VAR lets a goal stand one week, then next week doesn't? All you do when you have this rubbish system they dreamt up for football is kill off the atmosphere with 50/50 decisions being agonised over by video referees and celebrations becoming meaningless.
I said 'clear and obvious', because that is the precise wording of the law.
I like watching sports, I like watching football. I don't like watching video referees drawing lines over still frames on replays. That's not what the sport is supposed to be about for me, maybe that's the part you enjoy, if so, I don't get it.
I'm happy Leicester won btw, so no sour grapes.
I know that by the laws of the game it was the "correct" decision but in my opinion it's just ripping the joy out of the game! No-one can celebrate a goal properly and with the best will in the world it wouldn't have been given as offside by anyone other than a computer!
I'd like to see it go personally!
He's half a yard off. This isn't a close decision. What you are wanting is referees just judge it at the time...that would be unfair to Leicester
The offside decision in the Leicester v Quins game today would probably have been offside if they drew lines on the pitch.
They didn't though, it was so close that they wouldn't have gained any significant advantage from it, it led to a wonderful try and the fans got to celebrate a great bit of entertaining sport without some nerd with a ruler raining on their parade.
I would definitely take Rodgers at Arsenal.
This is an awful idea and thankfully will never happen. Camera angles will make certain decisions look more off/onside than they are. You'd end up with the same incident resulting in difference outcomes because of the position of cameras at different stadiums.I've said previously stop drawing lines and use your eyes.
The wording of the law for offsides makes no mention of clear and obvious. It's either offside or he isn't. In this case he was offside. The drawing of lines, while necessary, wasn't even needed in this case, on the freeze frame it was clear to the naked eye.You mean like VAR lets a goal stand one week, then next week doesn't? All you do when you have this rubbish system they dreamt up for football is kill off the atmosphere with 50/50 decisions being agonised over by video referees and celebrations becoming meaningless.
I said 'clear and obvious', because that is the precise wording of the law.
I like watching sports, I like watching football. I don't like watching video referees drawing lines over still frames on replays. That's not what the sport is supposed to be about for me, maybe that's the part you enjoy, if so, I don't get it.
I'm happy Leicester won btw, so no sour grapes.
All the complaints around var for offsides will be gone the moment an automated system is implemented, not by changing the offside rule.I’d honestly be so gutted for Leicester if the linesman had flagged and it wasn’t offside. That’s what VAR is there for.
The hatred for VAR for offside is misplaced. Blame the rule instead, hopefully they’ll rework it but knowing the organisations involved we’ll probably be disappointed.
He's half a yard off. This isn't a close decision. What you are wanting is referees just judge it at the time...that would be unfair to Leicester
You mean like the perfectly enjoyable entire history of football until VAR came in? Unfair how - as long as both teams are subject to the same rules, how can it be unfair?
All I'm saying is that I preferred the days when the attacking player was given the benefit of the doubt.
You mean like the perfectly enjoyable entire history of football until VAR came in? Unfair how - as long as both teams are subject to the same rules, how can it be unfair?
All I'm saying is that I preferred the days when the attacking player was given the benefit of the doubt.