Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Mar 2007
- Posts
- 3,875
That's a shambles, his front knee is marginally offside but I thought the VAR only overruled stuff if it is clear and obvious?
VAR's a joke but this isn't the case for offsides. Offsides are a matter of fact so if they think it's off, marginal or not, then it's off. It's only decisions on pens or red cards that have to be obvious errors.That's a shambles, his front knee is marginally offside but I thought the VAR only overruled stuff if it is clear and obvious?
MS paint is my guess.I'd love to know how those lines were generated![]()
That's a shambles, his front knee is marginally offside but I thought the VAR only overruled stuff if it is clear and obvious?
VAR's a joke but this isn't the case for offsides. Offsides are a matter of fact so if they think it's off, marginal or not, then it's off. It's only decisions on pens or red cards that have to be obvious errors.
Next seasons official VAR sponsor should be Crayola.Saw the picture on twitter and genuinely thought it was a joke...good lord.
I agree now in that he is offside. An inch of a knee though is not something that you would normally see in real time (or that we are used to, this is all new) and there was no advantage that anyone could see - the Huddersfield players themselves didn't question the goal.His knee is offside, it’s the correct call.
This is the BT line with the pundits saying he’s onside.
https://i.imgur.com/EfR8ZzI.png
Zoom in, his knee is over the line, and he can legally score with a knee