yes and I think it will happen in our lifetime.
IMO we probably have the "critical understanding" now. Not in NASA but other, erm, "agencies" in the USA.
The world economy needs to reach a threshold before it can happen too. And I think "world economy" is perhaps a little small scale. We probably need to colonise a couple more planets, such as the Moon and Mars, in order to get their mineral resources to be used, at first, to advance the civilisation and economies on Earth - but longer term to help build interstellar spacecraft.
Sustained nuclear fusion has, probably, already been solved by the USA. It's only the public sector and "higher level" government agencies like NASA which are still trying to get it working.
Life is good but, damn, wouldn't it have been awesome to have been born perhaps 200-300 years later?![]()
communicate with them in realistic timeframes then what exactly is the point?
We need to sort out our own planet first.
About 3.5 years to reach the nearest star.
Well 1000-2000 years down the line for all we know the human race could have long since exceeded light speed.
It wouldn't because of special relativity. For someone on the spaceship no time would have passed at all. If you travel close to speed of light for even a few seconds, thousands of years could have passed on earth. You can see it as a way of time travel if you like.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity
Burt said:communicate with them in realistic timeframes then what exactly is the point?
Alright, what are you saying?
I'd like to imagine rather than travelling through space we'd have learn to fold it (Scifi here) removing the need to exceed speeds rather, cheat it![]()
Alright, what are you saying?
I'd like to imagine rather than travelling through space we'd have learn to fold it (Scifi here) removing the need to exceed speeds rather, cheat it
I think you've got the wrong idea.
Please note the word "think" because I am not 100% on this either but, let's discuss.
It would still take a long time.
If a planet was 10 light years away and you travelled at the speed of light it would take 10 years for the people onboard the vessel doing so.
Despite the fact more time has passed back on Earth, it is still 10 years for the people on the ship, I don't think it changes anything how fast YOU are travelling.
"thousands of years could have passed on earth. You can see it as a way of time travel if you like."
Yes, but we are not travelling to earth are we? We are trying to go to another object in space...
EDIT EDIT/PS/Disclaimer..
That's how I was lead to believe it... please don't hurt me!![]()
Actually you're wrong. Time would pass very quickly for the people on the ship.
Say a ship wanted to travel 10ly and moved at 0.8c. To an outside observer, time taken = 10/0.8 = 12.5 years. To the people on the ship, time passed = t/gamma = t*(1-(v^2/c^2))^1/2 = 12.5*sqrt(0.36) = 12.5*0.6 = 7.5.
So to the onboard observer, the journey would only take 7 and a half years. To go 10 light years. Fairly convenient isn't it?![]()