Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
So tempted by the strix it will look good in my rig, wanted the fury x but I'm really warming to these instead
Get the sapphire
Yup... now fully unlocked! No artifacts on Firestrike!
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/8270816?
I will try some games and test for artifacts in an hour or so
Hi, Presumably that Firestrike result is with it now running at 1000 mhz stock cause my 1040 stock Fury Tri-x gives a graphics score of 15471. It'll be interesting to see how far it'll overclock now though.
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5680566
.. An 1100 overclock graphics score is 16258
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5681651
..
Some of my in game performance/temps. 1440P Max, no aa.
Fan speed is at 60%. Still purring quietly away .
Yes it was at 1000mhz stock. I clocked it to 1050mhz to see if it would match the Fury X:
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/8274852?
1100mhz seems like a no go, I didn't try anything in between.
these are very impressive temps.
You could try overclocking the cpu to see if it lifts your gpu score. Seeing as you now sport a full on fury x I would expect a little bit more.
hmmmm it is at 4.4ghz, do you think I need more?
hmmmm it is at 4.4ghz, do you think I need more?
I noticed on the gpu-z score that your Pixel fillrate has dropped compared to mine, Could that be partly why your not getting Fury X scores if your not?
What exactly have you done to your card, Unlocked it, Is that a bio's thing?
If not do you need to get a Fury X bio's for it now that you have all the cores unlocked?
I don't know nothing about the subject so I may be chatting total bile .
It's looking better in gpu-z there, but with your partial unlock your Pixel fillrate was reading as lower than the Sapphire Fury Tri-x's pixel fill rate (66.6) was at stock. At the moment 3dmark gets the name of the Fury cards wrong, I own a Sapphire Fury Tri-x the same as yours not a full Fury X.Sorry I think there is a bit of confusion here. The first post I did it was not fully unlocked. I then tried to fully unlock it and it worked fine (I didn't expect it to).
If you compare the fully unlocked Fury with your Fury X score here: http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/5773261/fs/5680566 - you will see it is the same.
The unlock I did is basically taking the original bios, modding it to unlock it to a full fury X and flashing it back. I am not sure if you can just flash a fury X bios on to a fury, I'd guess not. There is info on it here: http://www.overclock.net/t/1567179/...ity-tester-ver-1-6-and-atomtool#post_24235287
This is what it looks like when fully unlocked on GPU-Z:
I have manually overclocked it the extra 50mhz
The Furies seem like decent cards. I hope they're genuinely selling well, and the lack of stock isn't simply due to supply issues.
I'm holding out for the asus strix fury does anyone know if these are keeping things as cool as the tri-x ?