yet, I have seen plenty of screens at 1080p with max settings which made me think for a sec which looks better? GTA V at max and 4k or witcher at max and lower res
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
The Fury(X) Fiji Owners Thread
- Thread starter Kaapstad
- Start date
yet, I have seen plenty of screens at 1080p with max settings which made me think for a sec which looks better? GTA V at max and 4k or witcher at max and lower res
How many have you tried out so far? I went through 2 and couldn't be arsed with it anymore.
Went through 4 and now gave up, ordered a Sapphire Fury OC instead.
Permabanned
yet, I have seen plenty of screens at 1080p with max settings which made me think for a sec which looks better? GTA V at max and 4k or witcher at max and lower res
You tell me, briefly tried my 280X on my 4K tv but 25 FPS wasnt really much good.
So using demanding tech drops FPS, who would have thought. Did you also say AA, SSAO, tessellation, Bloom, Dynamic lighting, tressfx and many other advanced features were bad when they came out?
It's hardly Only gameworks, and in the case of Witcher 3; that's only hairworks.
I also never once claimed there was noFPS difference with Hairworks on and off, and if in other game gameworks features on and off.
That's just like complaining there's an FPS difference with any of the above mentioned technology on. It was even more the case when each of those features were new. Just like they are now.
I really don't understand this issue. It's like complaining when Crysis came out, and people with capable 6800GT's or 1950XTs couldn't run it maxed out, and you needed Tri-SLI 8800 Ultras to try and manage.
The same for any new game that introduces new technology and great graphics.
Would rather these features weren't added at all ( although it seems if it's labeled Gameworks yes), or heck as a strawman why don't developers just have 100% parity with console graphics and not give us any advanced features. Then everyone can run it "maxed".
You tell me, briefly tried my 280X on my 4K tv but 25 FPS wasnt really much good.
My point is, GTA V at 4k is absolutely stunning especially with distance scaling enabled. I was sitting in shock how alive the city looked when seeing it from a distance. Witcher(release version) was rivaling GTA V at how stunning it looked from screens I've seen.
But seeing how bad the game looks from uksoldierboy screens, I can say that witcher looks much worse at the moment. Especially at the SQUARE.
Good idea. It's a length and a half (ooohh eeerr) but a cert.
4.
This is really getting farcical now, amd's spouting such crap about it affecting only a small number of units.
Associate
- Joined
- 24 May 2011
- Posts
- 1,439
Well by any estimations four is still a small number..... That being said I get you point. Thing is with AMD theybwont address these points as there are so few articles about the issue. Simple fact is shareholders don't look at people moaning on forums so why draw shareholder attention to an issue that isn't making headlines... Sucks for us as we don't know what is happening or why...but you can understand why a company with financial issues has to be very careful what they say officially.
Caporegime
4! ******* hell!
Caporegime
I am quite surprised that Matt got 4 and he hasn't got any noise on any of them. Mine is silent as well.... Very strange indeed.
So using demanding tech drops FPS, who would have thought. Did you also say AA, SSAO, tessellation, Bloom, Dynamic lighting, tressfx and many other advanced features were bad when they came out?
It's hardly Only gameworks, and in the case of Witcher 3; that's only hairworks.
I also never once claimed there was noFPS difference with Hairworks on and off, and if in other game gameworks features on and off.
That's just like complaining there's an FPS difference with any of the above mentioned technology on. It was even more the case when each of those features were new. Just like they are now.
I really don't understand this issue. It's like complaining when Crysis came out, and people with capable 6800GT's or 1950XTs couldn't run it maxed out, and you needed Tri-SLI 8800 Ultras to try and manage.
The same for any new game that introduces new technology and great graphics.
Would rather these features weren't added at all ( although it seems if it's labeled Gameworks yes), or heck as a strawman why don't developers just have 100% parity with console graphics and not give us any advanced features. Then everyone can run it "maxed".
And how much do AA(most of the games I play have this broken), SSAO, tessellation (if done non nVidia way), Bloom, Dynamic lighting, tressfx (runs better on nvidia, than on AMD
) impact the fps? Not as much as Gameworks, and heck, if they impact it, they do it roughly the same on both, nvidia and AMD.It seems with every Gameworks game we receive these days we have controversy, devs talking ********, performance issues, game breaking issues. And in all those cases everyone is blaming consoles exclusively, because hey that is very popular to do, you know pc master race, is it not, batman?
nVidia is ******** on gaming community left and right, yet we have so many people who blindly ignore their practices and just go on with the crowd and blame console.
And by the way, when you compare 1080p screens of many games between ps4 and PC there is minimal difference in detail. Most of the PC games I have have AA broken completely. So that '100% parity' is already here
Only when you crank up the res on PC, you see huge difference.
4! ******* hell!
I'd be slinging it out the window if i got a fourth and it still had the issue. No way am i even considering buying one til this issue is properly fixed and stock aplenty.
My 2 are silent as well
I think with supply being at 30 cards throughout the world, we managed to grab all the good ones and the rest of them are just circulating around to all the guys from this forum
how 4 is a small number? For one person, I am so sorry for him
I know for a fact I would have given up during second RMA. All that hassle to return cards wait, receive, return, wait receive...
Associate
It feels like the same cards are sold over and over
And how much do AA(most of the games I play have this broken), SSAO, tessellation (if done non nVidia way), Bloom, Dynamic lighting, tressfx (runs better on nvidia, than on AMD
It seems with every Gameworks game we receive these days we have controversy, devs talking ********, performance issues, game breaking issues. And in all those cases everyone is blaming consoles exclusively, because hey that is very popular to do, you know pc master race, is it not, batman?
nVidia is ******** on gaming community left and right, yet we have so many people who blindly ignore their practices and just go on with the crowd and blame console.
.
Sounds more like you're projecting your issues here. Hairworks 1.0 knocks 10-15fps off in severe cases. That's nothing for a brand new tech, and was the case for each of the features I mentioned when they were first introduced and on their first version.
Also TressFX now runs better on NVIDIA hardware than AMD? Interesting that AMD had Xaviant disable it on NV hardware in Lichdom then, and that it wasn't the case when Tomb Raider originally launched with it.
I like how every Gameworks game is controversial, yet when there's a broken AMD game like Lichdom( where features are disabled on the competition), or the likes of BF4 it's all fine. A broken game mean bad development, not that a hardware company's fault.
It's obviously NVIDIA's fault for everything it seems. /s
You can believe that, but I shall continue to enjoy new games and new technology like I always have. It doesn't matter which GPU brand I end up with.
Also I'll happily blame console exclusivity as it does more harm to gamers by only allowing certain people with certain system to even get the game. And I'll happily blame bad developers such as Iron Galaxy and Ubisoft ( which I already stopped buying from some time ago ). Not the hardware companies for pushing technology forward with new features.
Last edited:
What issues? The only game with Gameworks I have is pCars, which I bought by mistake not knowing it has been supported by nvidia. Other than this I haven't actually owned any other Gameworks title. So I don't have 'my' issues with Gameworks
The only issue I have with it is that I laugh quite a bit about the issues other people have with Gameworks and all the stories which come with every Gameworks game. I know I should feel sorry for people who get caught with the issues, but I cannot help it
Anyways, before windows decided 16GB is not enough, took some screenies (4k, everything absolutely maxed (except frame scaling, don't have that much vram, I'm afraid )
https://flic.kr/p/vnfu17
https://flic.kr/p/vnfux9
Matt, you are right, after latest patch, game behaves decent again
)https://flic.kr/p/vnfu17
https://flic.kr/p/vnfux9
Matt, you are right, after latest patch, game behaves decent again
Associate
- Joined
- 24 May 2011
- Posts
- 1,439
how 4 is a small number? For one person, I am so sorry for him
I know for a fact I would have given up during second RMA. All that hassle to return cards wait, receive, return, wait receive...
Because each card is its own lottery. Having had three before that were bad his chances of having a fourth that was better was not really significantly better than when he was waiting for the third. That being said we can say it is very bad luck and perhaps evem indicative of a bigger problem....but 4 remains a small number of graphics cards.
Understand I had one that was noisy and was sent back and I fully note that this is a bigger issue than AMD let on....but it is still only the first batch with the vast majority of retailers expecting stock at the end of the month...I would hesitate to pick up any fury x in stock at the moment as it is very likely the first batch and this a risk....