The Fury(X) Fiji Owners Thread

[JediFragger]

I am impressed with the cooling capacity of the Predator 360.

4.9ghz OC on the 4820K and 1080/540 the Nano and max temps are 38 and 30 respectively. Most of the time are bellow those marks.
While under normal (gaming) use, at 70% fan speed is sufficient, and silent

Good to hear you're having a positive experience tbh. Looks a great option, and loads less fiddly than a custom loop!

Awesome temps to boot

 

[savagesam117]

Panos, have you got a picture of that? I'm thinking about one for my ITX PC get rid of the two AIO's. Maybe..

 

[Panos]

Sure took two shots last night after the first boot, so cabling is all over the place but here it is.

Spoiler

The sheer size of the Rad

Tonight installed back the BR player and moved the cabling & pipes around. I will take picks tomorrow now that is nice and tidy.

 

[Geeman1979]

Good idea, but not keen on the Quick disconnects as they look cheap & nasty.

 

[pete910]

Card looks tiny in there.
Personally feel it's the best out of the fury range, now that the price has dropped somewhat

 

[Radox-0]

Sure took two shots last night after the first boot, so cabling is all over the place but here it is.

Spoiler

The sheer size of the Rad

Tonight installed back the BR player and moved the cabling & pipes around. I will take picks tomorrow now that is nice and tidy.

Nice work man. Now push that Nano further, goes much further under water Do you plan to overvolt your card. Be interesting to see how it works on your card. Seems to make little difference for myself and in fact reduces the fps I get which is odd.

Finished my build weekend gone and posted in WC thread. Such a tiny little card with so much omph for HTPC use. Pretty happy with it.

Spoiler

 

[pete910]

Ok, I admit. That looks damn nice Radox !!!!

 

[Panos]

Nice work man. Now push that Nano further, goes much further under water Do you plan to overvolt your card. Be interesting to see how it works on your card. Seems to make little difference for myself and in fact reduces the fps I get which is odd.

Finished my build weekend gone and posted in WC thread. Such a tiny little card with so much omph for HTPC use. Pretty happy with it.

Spoiler

1130/600 atm Trying to push it more

humm. decided to hold back to 1100/560 clock. While benchmarks are running fine at 1130/600 some games do crash, while temps are mid 20s for both CPU & GPU.
Maybe I will try bit more overclocking and benching over the weekend to find a better OC between 1100/560 and 1130/600.

Anyhow, very happy. Especially considering that I am CPU handicapped even at 4900Mhz, and the Nano TDP is significantly small.
Saying that 175W TDP high end GPU at 1100/560 is f fast. and is more overclock that even some watercooled Nanos eg the one from Guru3d running same setup.

Try to beat that NV

 

[Radox-0]

1130/600 atm Trying to push it more

humm. decided to hold back to 1100/560 clock. While benchmarks are running fine at 1130/600 some games do crash, while temps are mid 20s for both CPU & GPU.
Maybe I will try bit more overclocking and benching over the weekend to find a better OC between 1100/560 and 1130/600.

Anyhow, very happy. Especially considering that I am CPU handicapped even at 4900Mhz, and the Nano TDP is significantly small.
Saying that 175W TDP high end GPU at 1100/560 is f fast. and is more overclock that even some watercooled Nanos eg the one from Guru3d running same setup.

Try to beat that NV

Nice. From AMDMatt's great post however it sounds like the Memory will only work in increments so 500, 545 and 600 so anything in between is rounded either was and not running at indicated speeds. Sadly my card can hold 545, but cant do 600 on the memory stable, but the core clock does decent.

 

[Radox-0]

Double post

 

[flopper]

Anyhow, very happy. Especially considering that I am CPU handicapped even at 4900Mhz, and the Nano TDP is significantly small.
Saying that 175W TDP high end GPU at 1100/560 is f fast. and is more overclock that even some watercooled Nanos eg the one from Guru3d running same setup.

Try to beat that NV

they cant, they are not as advanced technology wise.

 

[Panos]

Nice. From AMDMatt's great post however it sounds like the Memory will only work in increments so 500, 545 and 600 so anything in between is rounded either was and not running at indicated speeds. Sadly my card can hold 545, but cant do 600 on the memory stable, but the core clock does decent.

Cheers, set it to 545 then and is fine.

System runs nice, I am very pleased especially with the card and overclock.

 

[savagesam117]

Love the look of that Panos. And Radox, yours is so pretty!

How do you think the 240 would hold up? That's all I can fit in my ITX case.

 

[Panos]

Love the look of that Panos. And Radox, yours is so pretty!

How do you think the 240 would hold up? That's all I can fit in my ITX case.

Depends how much you plan to overclock the CPU.

The Nano will hold because is the first device on the loop and at 70%-75% fan speed you should be ok

 

[Radox-0]

Love the look of that Panos. And Radox, yours is so pretty!

How do you think the 240 would hold up? That's all I can fit in my ITX case.

Thats all I can fit in the case and a slim one at that, as its a HTPC not the worst thing.

With the EK SE 240 mm with a pair of thier F4-120ER fans after about 3-4 hours of play with the fans at 55% the water temp gets to about 38-42 degrees. The Nano settles in at 3-4 degrees above and the 4690k @ about 55 degrees. This is with the 4690k @ 4.2 Ghz and Nano at 1115 / 545 Mhz.

While warm, the slim radiator and the fact the secondary chips such as PCH and power phases are pumping their heat into the loop being a full cover motherboard block, its not too bad, moreso as the case is not ideal either, so really my condition is the worst case scenario. Best thing is neither throttle and at that sort of fan speed its fairly reasonable.

 

[savagesam117]

Well doesn't the Fury X use more power than a Nano? And the CPU is currently at 4.8 but it doesn't need to be that high.

I've currently got a 240mm OcUK AIO and then the Fury X rad in there too. I keep my Fury X at 1070/530 without any volts added.

I can put a 120 in the rear, 240 up top, and a 240 in the front but i've got the standard 200mm fan there at the moment.

 

[Boomzilla]

So who has a card that can do the devilish 666Mhz?
Mine crashes during Firestrike Ultra with HBM on 666

 

[Kaapstad]

Radeon R9 390X 8GB CrossFire vs. Radeon R9 FuryX 4GB @Ocaholic

http://www.ocaholic.co.uk/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=3949

 

[Kaapstad]

The latest Fury X Heatkiller waterblocks.

 

[muziqaz]

Nice, but EKWB ones look much better