The Great Thermal Interface Material Con

Don
Joined
7 Aug 2003
Posts
44,276
Location
Aberdeenshire
We've all heard stories about how expensive TIMs are a waste of money and the bog standard stuff is just as good, hell even toothpaste or marmite will do a job just as good.

But is there any truth to this?

Well I thought I would test them to find out, so I did a head to head between:-

head2head.jpg


Using the following test set-up:-

4800X2 AM2 socket
Asus M2N32-SLI MB
Thermaltake Big Typhoon

head2head4.JPG


The setup was placed on the floor to minimise temperature fluctuations and the room window was fully open to ensure proper ventilation.

First test was at stock (2.4GHz) using 1.5V to generate a bit of extra heat to emphasise the effect of the TIM. First up the AS5 (as originally installed), a 15min S&M FPU test run produced the following peak load and idle temps:-

head2head2.JPG


Load 49C
Idle 26C

HS off showing coverage of AS5:-

head2head3.JPG


Next test was to use the toothpaste, it was surprisingly easy to apply and a even spread was easily achieved using the credit card method:-

head2head5.JPG


Jokester
 
Don
OP
Joined
7 Aug 2003
Posts
44,276
Location
Aberdeenshire
head2head6.JPG


Load 60C
Idle 29C

Using the toothpaste made a little difference to the idle temps but quite a significant difference to the load temps (11C).

Following this I thought about seeing how far I could overclock using the toothpaste. Knowing the max stable overclock achieved on this chip was 3GHz at 1.45V I restored these options and re-ran S&M:-

head2head7.JPG


Load 62C
Idle 29C

CPU coverage:-

head2head8.JPG


Test was re-run with AS5 using the same settings as a direct comparison:-

head2head9.JPG


Load 52-53C
Idle 27C

Again a significant difference between the two of the order of 10C. Sadly this chip won't go over 3GHz regardless of cooling so I wasn't able to ascertain how much of a difference this would make to an overclock.

One thing I was pleasantly surprised with was that cleaning off the toothpaste left the CPU spotlessly clean:-

head2head10.JPG


So in summary, paste does make a difference, if you're overclocking you might as well use the best you can get, if you're just using it at stock just use the free TIM that comes with it, or if you need to remount at some point, just use toothpaste!

Jokester
 
Associate
Joined
26 May 2005
Posts
505
Location
whoooping out a window
LMAO that is so funny

I suppose just in case you were righteously preeching the postive cooling effects toothpaste had.


{But actually youve never cooled anything before in your life,and missheard your mate saying he cleans a very important part of the cpu to make it shinier & cooler ;the TIM, with colgate. :D That blew you away,and is the only bit of the conversation you remember}
 
Don
OP
Joined
7 Aug 2003
Posts
44,276
Location
Aberdeenshire
MikeTimbers said:
Your numbers are interesting as they are different from those achieved by the infamous Dan who found little to no difference. You really need to do the same tests several times to remove the possibility of a bad mount affecting the results.

I've always considered his results as being bull. There's been numerous other test carried out using a variety of compounds (admitadly not toothpaste or marmite) and they seem to always place AS5 ahead by a degree or two in front of Ceramique which is a degree or two in front of the rest.

Jokester

Edit:- I'll re-run the test with the toothpaste at the same settings as the AS5 and no TIM that I've just done.
 
Don
OP
Joined
7 Aug 2003
Posts
44,276
Location
Aberdeenshire
Testing at 2.4GHz and 1.4V

AS5-

head2headAS5.JPG


Load 42-42C

Toothpaste:-

head2headtooth.JPG


Load 48C

None at all:-

Load 55C

head2headnone.JPG


And then rerun the 3GHz at 1.45V with the toothpaste to check repeatability.

head2headtooth2.JPG


Load 62C

Jokester
 
Associate
Joined
5 Jun 2006
Posts
155
nice thread!! ... read in PC format that there is not really a huge difference (1-2C) between the various thermal compounds. I would go for one that is cheap and easy to remove. Having said that I still have a nearly full tube of AS5 to play with.

Cheapest solution I can think of is vegtable oil!!!! I dunno whether it is too thin to use but I am sure it would be more effective than toothpaste!! At 60p for a 1litre bottle veg oil maybe a nice cheap option. It is flamable I suppose though I expect so is thermal grease!!!!
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Jan 2003
Posts
21,002
Location
Cornwall
jpe20 said:
nice thread!! ... read in PC format that there is not really a huge difference (1-2C) between the various thermal compounds. I would go for one that is cheap and easy to remove. Having said that I still have a nearly full tube of AS5 to play with.

Cheapest solution I can think of is vegtable oil!!!! I dunno whether it is too thin to use but I am sure it would be more effective than toothpaste!! At 60p for a 1litre bottle veg oil maybe a nice cheap option. It is flamable I suppose though I expect so is thermal grease!!!!
oils a bad idea as if it gets too hot it will harm your components, also its not realy viscus enough for it to be applyed well
 
Man of Honour
Joined
14 Nov 2005
Posts
10,661
Location
Up North
Nice experiment Jokester!

I would like to see are more indepth test of a few known brands of thermal paste though as only the real hard up are going to use toothpaste imo when a cheap grease costs £2. Brands such as mx-01, akasa, zalman, liquid pro etc showing the idle load/ differences under a controlled environment (constant ambient temps)would be great. Toothpaste is all good and well but I would wager that it would dry out in no time leaving a thermal barrier rather than an interface after a week or so - maybe less. Whereas proper thermal grease will still be 'greasy' for months on end.

I trust forum reviews rather than website reviews as such websites tend to be biased to the products they sell ;)

N1 Jokester.
 
Associate
Joined
8 Apr 2004
Posts
1,104
Location
Romsey/Hampshire
the thermal conductivity of the thermal compounds is way way lower that that of the metals they sit between (in this case heatsink and chip). The real contrubutor to the difference in performance would be application thickness. These pastes are gap fullers and should be applied wafer thin, and to ensure aon high points on the mating surface are in contact metal on metal... then you'll get best overall thermal performance.

Thnner is better, scrub heatsink in place before locking down with bolts or clips. The force of these clips alone is not good enough to push out excess heatsink compound.

I'll see if i can get my mate to run some thermal sims if you guys can give me the following info:-

Chip power dissipation.
Thermal conductivity of compounds you want to evaluate, (Arrctic silver, TIM supplied with heatsink)
Areaof contact
 
Don
OP
Joined
7 Aug 2003
Posts
44,276
Location
Aberdeenshire
Spent this morning testing the various compounds I had at my disposable.

test1.jpg


Got some cheapo free stuff (out of a Waterchill kit I think)
Thermaltake paste (came with TT BT I think)
Geil Copper paste (not sure where I got it from)
Arctic Silver 5
Arctic Silver Ceramique

First up was the toothpaste from yesterdays application (I've added in chipset temps to get an idea of any changes in ambient):-

test2.JPG

Load 53
Chipset 32

Next up the cheapo stuff:-

test3.JPG

Load 53-54
Chipset 31

Very much similar to the toothpaste :p

Next up was the Geil Copper paste, this was really easy to apply and getting a smooth even thin layer was simple:-

test4.JPG

Load 50-51
Chipset 31

Just marginally better than the toothpaste.

Jokester
 
Don
OP
Joined
7 Aug 2003
Posts
44,276
Location
Aberdeenshire
Next up was the AS5:-

test5.JPG

Load 46
Chipset 31

Ceramique:-

test6.JPG

Load 47
Chipset 32

Very close the AS5 probably nothing in it when considering the chipset topped out 1C more than in the AS5 case.

Thermaltake:-
test7.JPG

Load 48
Chipset 31

Pleasantly surprised with this one, had the same appearance as Ceramique and was equally easy to spread so it is perhaps just rebadged.

Jokester
 
Back
Top Bottom