The Greatest Olympian Ever?

Caporegime
Joined
8 Mar 2007
Posts
37,146
Location
Surrey
Freestyle only means front crawl because at the top thats the fastest stroke,

In lower level competition, especially with very young swimmers, you quite often see people swimming backstroke in freestyle events. I even did it myself a couple of times when I was proper young, as I hadn't got the hang of the breathing in front crawl.
 
Soldato
Joined
8 Mar 2007
Posts
10,938
But no one would win the 100m freestyle doing the butterfly... Freestyle means front crawl. Which gets us back to the argument about there being too many different events when some strokes are clearly better than others speedwise.

Well no Freestyle, as the name suggests means you can do whatever you want. It just so happens that the front crawls seems to be the fastest stroke for the top pros but they aren't forced into using that stroke.

But as you correctly say, that then begs the question why have other stroke styles at all, just make them all freestyle.

According to Wikipedia there are 34 individual swimming events, which is far ahead of any other single event in terms of amount of potential medals.
 
Soldato
Joined
10 Sep 2007
Posts
5,387
Location
Sheffield
Edwards "only" won one gold and one silver. His triple jump records remains unbroken after 17 years, but it's not an Olympic record.

Bah yeah, I forgot his WR wasn't in the Olympics. I honestly thought he had won more than one gold though, he seemed dominant for so long.. So yeah, I'm very shocked at that. :eek:
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Dec 2003
Posts
16,432
Well no Freestyle, as the name suggests means you can do whatever you want. It just so happens that the front crawls seems to be the fastest stroke for the top pros but they aren't forced into using that stroke.

But as you correctly say, that then begs the question why have other stroke styles at all, just make them all freestyle.

According to Wikipedia there are 34 individual swimming events, which is far ahead of any other single event in terms of amount of potential medals.

i dont get all this but yeah phelps is gonna win that many blah de blah he can enter loads of events blah de blah

well what about runners? whats stopping them entering 100/200/400/relays/1500/5000/10000/hurdles etc etc

its only like phelps doing all the swimming disciplines
 
Caporegime
Joined
8 Mar 2007
Posts
37,146
Location
Surrey
Phelps does far from all the swimming disciplines. The only breaststroke he does is in the medley, and he doesn't swim long distance either.

I do think you need to work out medals as a percentage of possible medals (i.e. events entered) though, to even things out. However I expect Phelps would probably still be up the top of that list.
 
Associate
Joined
21 Jan 2010
Posts
700
well what about runners? whats stopping them entering 100/200/400/relays/1500/5000/10000/hurdles etc etc

its only like phelps doing all the swimming disciplines
I think this is too superficial.

With running the sprinters utilize different muscle fibres to the distance runners. Each athlete start with what nature blessed them with and train one or other, or a blend of both, but the compromise is always suited to certain types of event.

I'd guess that if Phelps was put in the swim part of the triathlon he would be soundly beaten, but his swimming events in the pool are sufficiently similar that he can compete in most of them.
 
Caporegime
Joined
8 Mar 2007
Posts
37,146
Location
Surrey
There is such a difference between all the swimming disciplnes. Far more than people think. The idea that swimming is just swimming and its all the same is simply wrong.

Being good in Medleys and also in a number of individual events is rare. It would be like a heptathlon champion also being the 100m champion and the javelin champion.

And its not like Phelps is competing in every event either. How many is he in, 7 or so? Out of a possible 34? Yes swimming has a higher number of medal chances for athletes than other sports, but that doesn't change the fat that Phelps has dominated. If it was really that easy for anyone to pick up shed loads of medals then there would be loads of people with similar numbers to Phelps. But as it happens, he has almost double the next highest swimmer in the all time medals list.
 
Last edited:
Caporegime
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Posts
48,104
Location
On the hoods
Well no Freestyle, as the name suggests means you can do whatever you want. It just so happens that the front crawls seems to be the fastest stroke for the top pros but they aren't forced into using that stroke.

Well, yeah, it's freestyle in the sense that you can do any stroke you like, but in a Henry Ford'ian way you can win with any stroke so long as it's front crawl.
 
Caporegime
Joined
8 Mar 2007
Posts
37,146
Location
Surrey
^it would be different if he was british no doubt :rolleyes:

I do get the point though. You can't say that Phelps is 4x better than Chris Hoy simply on the number of medals they have. But there does seem to be feeling in here that Phelps is actually not that good and its just really easy to win lots of medals in swimming. But if you take swimming in isolation, Phelps has completely dominated that sport.

Maybe you should grade people within their own sports against their peers to gauge their performance? Having 10 gold medals when the average for the sport is 9, for example, would be very different to having 10 when the average for the sport is 1.
 
Associate
Joined
8 May 2007
Posts
877
And its not like Phelps is competing in every event either. How many is he in, 7 or so? Out of a possible 34?

A possible 17 :)

I doubt most athletes compare their medal total with those from other sports anyway. It's mostly just the media and fans who want to argue about "greatest olympian evar!!!".
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Jun 2005
Posts
13,963
How has nobody mentioned Jesse Owens yet???

i thought id posted him , must have clicked away before clicking post the last time i read this thread. only just been reminded now because michael johnson had said the same


phelps and his mutant feet dont even get a look in
 
Associate
Joined
19 Dec 2011
Posts
439
Carl Lewis for me. Phelps is up there definitely but Steve Redgrave? No way. How many people in the world do any form of rowing? I'd put any track athlete who's won 2 gold medals above Redgrave.
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Dec 2002
Posts
7,101
Location
Inverness
Really we're comparing apples and oranges.
Agreed. Though it would be fair to say the majority of people mentioned in this thread would easily make it on to a list of 'The greatest Olympians of all time', I just don't think I could easily rate one above all of the others.

Another names to add would be Larissa Latynina & Alexei Nemov. I wonder what Florence Griffith-Joyner could have gone on to if she hadn't retired after the 1988 Olympics, she was something else.
 
Associate
Joined
2 Feb 2012
Posts
1,992
theres an argument for ainslie but anyone who wins gold in only one discipline cant be compared to winners in multi disciplines tbh

Jim Thorpe

Thorpe's Olympic record of 8413 points in the decathlon stood for nearly two decades. !!! that to me is more of an acheivment than a single discipline he was also extremely talented in other sports not represented in the olympics
 
Caporegime
Joined
9 May 2005
Posts
31,722
Location
Cambridge
I wonder what Florence Griffith-Joyner could have gone on to if she hadn't retired after the 1988 Olympics, she was something else.

Yes how strange that she increased her PB's in both the 100 and 200 by large margins and then quit in 88 when out of competition drug testing was coming into force in 89. Retiring at what 29 after increasing her physique and records so dramatically in 88.

How odd ;) I personally doubt she would have added much to her tally before being caught and stripped of what she had.
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Dec 2002
Posts
7,101
Location
Inverness
That's why I think it would have been interesting to see. Never tested positive (she was tested incidentally but not out of competition), people though she got better but too quickly as were suspicious of it. She retired to have family and to persue other things, which she did. She attempted a comeback but had problems with injury. 10 years later she died having never really returned to competition. So maybe she was a drugs cheat (many in the 80s were), maybe she wasn't. We'll never know.
 
Soldato
Joined
13 Jan 2004
Posts
20,961
Greatest Olympian of all time based on medals won alone is such a stupid performance measurement.

At best you could call Phelps the Greatest Olympic Swimmer of all time and leave it at that.

To be the Greatest Olympian of all time I think you need to be successful in multiple disciplines. Chances are if you are the best at swimming in one event you are likely to be the best at swimming in all swimming events.
 
Back
Top Bottom