• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

The GTX Titan X owners thread.

PayneUK said:
So now you guys/gals have had a chance to put these through their paces is now the time to jump on the 4k bandwagon with two TX’s? With the view that I don’t want to buy any more GPU’s for 18 to 24 months after this.

Or would it be best to go safe with a Swift, even though two cards may be overkill for 1440p now I can be confident they will still demolish at stuff in 2016(and probably 2017 as consoles will limit how far companies will push things).
Click to expand...

If you like the original ROG Swift, maybe the upcoming 4k ROG Swift would appeal to you if you don't need 100+ fps gaming.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTQMdsLFj8M
 
Cut down due to defective L2 cache with memory bridge for the last 0.5gb, people upgrading from 970s to have something else to moan about :p

53538265.jpg



(Disclaimer: I don't expect this to happen)
 
africanos23 said:
SLI Titan Xs should be close to Quad SLI GTX980s without the scaling problems.

Would love to see those benchies from Kaapstad that has both 2 Titan Xs and 4xGTX980s.
Click to expand...

hahaaa

and I quote:

ALXAndy said:
Yeah that statement was a little outrageous.

It's nowhere near as fast as 980 SLI if SLI works. Even overclocked.
Click to expand...

:p

It would appear they are considerable quicker :)
 
africanos23 said:
SLI Titan Xs should be close to Quad SLI GTX980s without the scaling problems.

Would love to see those benchies from Kaapstad that has both 2 Titan Xs and 4xGTX980s.
Click to expand...

Below is the 2160p table from the Heaven 4 bench, there are 2 TXs in the table to give you an idea of the performance.




2160p

1 GPU

  1. Score 471, GPU 780 @1263/1852, CPU 4770k @4.5, whyscotty Link

2 GPUs

  1. Score 1319, GPU TitanX @1380/2002, CPU 4930k @4.7, Kaapstad Link
  2. Score 936, GPU nvTitan @993/1751, CPU 3930k @4.625, Gregster Link
  3. Score 700, GPU 970 @1478/2030, CPU 5930k @3.8, Clov!s Link

3 GPUs

  1. Score 1292, GPU 290X @1230/1625, CPU 4930k @4.5, Kaapstad Link
  2. Score 1251, GPU nvTitan @1097/1753, CPU 3930k @4.4, whyscotty Link
  3. Score 1214, GPU 290X @1135/1500, CPU 3970X @4.4, LtMatt Link

4 GPUs

  1. Score 1759, GPU nvTitan @981/1788, CPU 3930k @4.8, Kaapstad Link
  2. Score 1702, GPU 980 @1472/1962, CPU 5960X @4.0, Kaapstad Link
  3. Score 1682, GPU 290X @1230/1500, CPU 4930k @4.8, Kaapstad Link
  4. Score 1382, GPU 290X @1000/1250, CPU 3970X @4.9, AMDMatt Link
 
Drojman said:
This card has been perfect for me so far.

Dying Light maxed at 3440x1440. 75fps average. Love it.
Click to expand...

Dying Light is a game at 1440p with textures on High (and you can tell the difference with medium, they looked very compressed) that struggled on the 980's frame buffer. :)

Nice res BTW, literally just took delivery of my wide aspect DELL :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom