The High-Res Screenshot Thread!
- Thread starter Margaret
- Start date
That's because nobody is downscaling screenshots like a panzy.
Either that or you're blind.
I think you're the one that's blind jih errr margaret
.He has a point, warhead looks quite ugly compared to crysis.
Your pics look very good but still not as good as the original crysis, it's a bit worse...
Smithy's and tchan_4's ( well , his last post pic anyways) pics look like far cry to me with a small foliage update
. It really looks terrible...But I haven't seen warhead in motion yet perhaps there it's better I dunno. Original Crysis looked far better in motion...
Last edited:
Not everybody is running the game maxed out...
and these are standard configs, wait for custom configs like the original Crysis or whatever.
Looks better to me when I'm playing the game anyway, downscaled screenshots (like most Crysis screenshots on this forum) will always look better than full sized.
and these are standard configs, wait for custom configs like the original Crysis or whatever.
Looks better to me when I'm playing the game anyway, downscaled screenshots (like most Crysis screenshots on this forum) will always look better than full sized.
nope my eye sight is perfectly fine, dunno about yours tho?
can clearly see its not got as much eye candy as the original crysis!
Obviously haven't played the game then.
Besides, not everybody is using uncompressed screenshots on this forum, nor is everybody running the game maxed out. So you can hardly judge it by the above shots, ask people who are definitely maxing the game out before judging.
very over protective over just a game arnt you? lol
Anyway
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=12536262&postcount=3075
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=12533508&postcount=3074
yes i know there still very good graphics, but still not as good as original, as i was getting at
Anyway
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=12536262&postcount=3075
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=12533508&postcount=3074
yes i know there still very good graphics, but still not as good as original, as i was getting at
Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 58,021
- Location
- Surrey
Ha, chav zombie 
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 May 2006
- Posts
- 5,786
Some Chronicles of Riddick for everyone:
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 May 2006
- Posts
- 5,786
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 May 2006
- Posts
- 5,786
Last edited:
Smithy's and tchan_4's ( well , his last post pic anyways) pics look like far cry to me with a small foliage update
All my screenshots are on the Mainstream setting with no AA/AF. There is still Gamer/Enthusiast settings to choose from.
Minimum
Mainstream
Gamer
Enthusiast
I played mine on mainstream as I don't really care about the graphics. If my system can play the game, I'm happy.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 58,021
- Location
- Surrey
I love Escape from Butchers Bay, still looks amazing next to today's games imo.
Warhead
Here's a few pics. Runs OK, all settings on enthusiast in Vista 64. DX9 mode with following hardware: Opteron 165 @ 2.5, 2GB PC3500 RAM, 8800GTS 640MB. Sadly I do get moments of slowdown but the pop-in isn't much of a deal as it was when I started playing.
Here's a few pics. Runs OK, all settings on enthusiast in Vista 64. DX9 mode with following hardware: Opteron 165 @ 2.5, 2GB PC3500 RAM, 8800GTS 640MB. Sadly I do get moments of slowdown but the pop-in isn't much of a deal as it was when I started playing.