Associate
This seems like it could have been a witch hunt where someones career and personal life has been ruined.
Shagging your wife’s sister isn’t illegal, but it still means you're a bit of a ****The Met saying nothing illegal took place doesn't mean much to be honest.
I didn't say anything about pics of an 'underage' male..Where’s the evidence of this? The Sun are now rowing back on the claim that the younger male was even underage to begin with.
if someone is married and they are going about using dating apps - gay or hetro - then that's immoral behaviorAn older male talking to younger men happens every day in the gay dating world. It really isn’t that shocking, but please continue clutching those pearls.
Shagging your wife’s sister isn’t illegal, but it still means you're a bit of a ****
I didn't say anything about pics of an 'underage' male..
if someone is married and they are going about using dating apps - gay or hetro - then that's immoral behavior
Why do people think Overclockers is some mega important high profile forum. This conversations being had on thousands of sites worldwide, they can’t sue them all.The literal only proof of this is a doctored image by The Sun and we have no information about whether the guy ended contact if presumably they found out about it themselves.
This thread is veering so close to litigation that I think i'm about to stop.
What have I got wrong there factually?
The AI lawyer scrubbing keywords is almost certainly already a thing, but sure I guess it's a bit hyperbolic.Why do people think Overclockers is some mega important high profile forum. This conversations being had on thousands of sites worldwide, they can’t sue them all.
the only aspect about underage legality was to do with pictures of someone under the age of 18, nothing else. As thats been tossed out the window, there is nothing 'underage' about the story.You said “young boy”. I didn’t say anything about pics?
And? Just because you excuse degeneracy and lack or morals doesn't mean the rest of us do.Hah! Married people do much worse up and down the country every minute of every day… and have for centuries. It doesn’t capture the 24-72hour news cycle and ruin their careers. We really need to lose these Victorian platitudes.
Shagging your wife’s sister isn’t illegal, but it still means you're a bit of a ****
Just because you excuse degeneracy and lack or morals doesn't mean the rest of us do.
Exactly - so why are you still referring to young boys instead of consenting young adult men as it appears to be in this case?the only aspect about underage legality was to do with pictures of someone under the age of 18, nothing else. As thats been tossed out the window, there is nothing 'underage' about the story.
And? Just because you excuse degeneracy and lack or morals doesn't mean the rest of us do.
My comment was more aimed at the BBC and government as opposed to the presenter in question. Jimmy Saville etc.Has there been an update contradicting the previous reports that no underage pictures had been bought?
I know that a lot of people don't like being called out on their behaviour online.You know him well then? to be able to state with authority how he would react?
Yeah well my money was on Fiona Bruce. Gutted.Disappointing, thought it was going to be Clare Balding.
I know that a lot of people don't like being called out on their behaviour online.
He's not the first person situations like this happen to.
Paying a teenager money for sexual images is considered immoral by society, whatever our personal views of it is.People haven’t been allowed to openly hate gays and other minorities in years, so they were throthing at the bit to sharpen their pitchforks this time at the merest hint of impropriety.
By all reliable accounts it isn’t clear he’s done anything illegal or even immoral as of yet?