The Huw Edwards situation

Status
Not open for further replies.
My opinion?

My opinion is you just made a load of stuff up, with no grounding to support your statement.

Or did you mean my view in how Huw would have reacted. I have no idea, I do not know him personally so I have literally zero idea on how he would react.
I mean at the moment its looking likely there is no founding to the allegation so if that ends up being true I may hazard a guess (but it would be a guess) he may react like the majority of the population?

An opinion is my view. You don't know me and I don't know you. So I'm not expecting you to take my word as gospel. That is the difference between an opinion and factual typing. Unless someone specifically says something is a fact, and provide links then the default position is a post is the persons opinion.

Why would he react the same as everyone else when he's the one involved? You seem to lack some empathy for his situation.
 
I don’t think the age the person was when the payment was made has been established. Or indeed whether a payment was made at all judging by the wife’s statement today. Regardless, over 18 = not a teenager in the eyes of the law.

You do realise that onlyfans entire business model is built mostly on older people paying younger people? $1.2 billion revenue is a lot of losers…

Looked down on by the older, more repressed, parts of society - sure.
If a person pays for porn, when their is an abundance of free porn that person is seen as a simp.
 
An opinion is my view. You don't know me and I don't know you. So I'm not expecting you to take my word as gospel. That is the difference between an opinion and factual typing. Unless someone specifically says something is a fact, and provide links then the default position is a post is the persons opinion.

Why would he react the same as everyone else when he's the one involved? You seem to lack some empathy for his situation.

I lack empathy for his situation and yet your the one saying he would be the first to be taking the moral high ground.

Odd, even for you.
 
I don’t think the age the person was when the payment was made has been established. Or indeed whether a payment was made at all judging by the wife’s statement today. Regardless, over 18 = not a teenager in the eyes of the law.
do you mean child not teenager? 2 very different things
You do realise that onlyfans entire business model is built mostly on older people paying younger people? $1.2 billion revenue is a lot of losers…
yes sad, lonely, degenerate losers
 
Which evidence doesn't exist?

I'd love to see the evidence for the grounds you have for giving credit to The Sun's instagram story.

It's not just the edited pictures by The Sun right. The ones which specify the age months too late.

But we won't see anything will we. That's all there is and I'm disgusted that you called that acceptable.
 
If a person pays for porn, when their is an abundance of free porn that person is seen as a simp.
Free porn is arguably more dangerous to society as the provenance and consent is far harder to establish. The potential for abuse is far greater, even if they appear to be adults they have may be taken advantage of in other ways, particularly where addictions are present.

Adult sex workers who are in control of their output using mediums like OF is something I think we should all be far more comfortable with.
 
Last edited:
If a person pays for porn, when their is an abundance of free porn that person is seen as a simp.

confused.jpg

"Simp is an internet slang term describing someone who shows excessive sympathy and attention toward another person, typically someone who does not reciprocate the same feelings, in pursuit of affection or a sexual relationship. Urban Dictionary defines a simp as "someone who does way too much for a person they like""
 
confused.jpg

"Simp is an internet slang term describing someone who shows excessive sympathy and attention toward another person, typically someone who does not reciprocate the same feelings, in pursuit of affection or a sexual relationship. Urban Dictionary defines a simp as "someone who does way too much for a person they like""
like giving money to someone who doesnt care you exist beyond giving them money you mean?
 
I'd love to see the evidence for the grounds you have for giving credit to The Sun's instagram story.

It's not clear what you're even asking for now tbh. They're directly citing Instagram DMs, I'm not sure what else you're expecting there?

But we won't see anything will we. That's all there is and I'm disgusted that you called that acceptable.

What did I call acceptable? Again can you try to quote me or be more specific so you're clearly addressing arguments I've made rather than just coming back with some ranting.

You seem to be wilfully ignoring a lot of context... like the updates concerning the 3rd and 4th people to come forwards... or indeed basic social media stuff like sliding into DMs, sending unsolicited messages and seemingly even ignoring what Instagram is with your denials that there was any indication of age.

Why are you so desperate to downplay this to the point where you're making claims you can't possibly make?
 
Last edited:
I lack empathy for his situation and yet your the one saying he would be the first to be taking the moral high ground.

Odd, even for you.
So his depression as just coincidentally happened at this time?

If he didn't think he was doing anything morally wrong, and he has more facts than me and you, I think he would have come out defending himself.
 
do you mean child not teenager? 2 very different things

yes sad, lonely, degenerate losers

No, I mean anyone over 18 is an adult. Teenager to me means people who clearly aren’t children under 18. Child to me would mean anyone under like 12. Maybe it’s an age thing - I’m only 32.
So his depression as just coincidentally happened at this time?

If he didn't think he was doing anything morally wrong, and he has more facts than me and you, I think he would have come out defending himself.
No doubt his situation will be different if he’s been in the closet for 60 years…
 
Last edited:
confused.jpg

"Simp is an internet slang term describing someone who shows excessive sympathy and attention toward another person, typically someone who does not reciprocate the same feelings, in pursuit of affection or a sexual relationship. Urban Dictionary defines a simp as "someone who does way too much for a person they like""
Giving money to people they only know through a screen in the hope it gives them some personal connection.

This was in relation to onlyfans. Though it can happen to any content creator.
 
Last edited:
Adult sex workers who are in control of their output using mediums like OF is something I think we should all be far more comfortable with.
Whores. The word you are looking for is whores, not "sex workers".

No, I mean anyone over 18 is an adult. Teenager to me means people who clearly aren’t children under 18. Child to me would mean anyone under like 12. Maybe it’s an age thing - I’m only 32.
Regardless, over 18 = not a teenager in the eyes of the law.
someone 18 plus is an adult, as they are no longer a child - the teenager element is irrelevant to the 'law'.
 
Last edited:
So his depression as just coincidentally happened at this time?

If he didn't think he was doing anything morally wrong, and he has more facts than me and you, I think he would have come out defending himself.


FFS i linked the article earlier in regards his 20 year battle with depression.

Grow up seriously.

Not everything is a CT
 
Why, the Sun Instagram story for the last 15 pages.

Nothing like a good old fit of the incomprehension to strike after 15 pages.

See you're just making things up again, my POV is that that's unacceptable and we shouldn't expect that behaviour from a BBC presenter. Do you want to try and quote the post you're referring to or were you just putting words in my mouth again?

You seem to want to rant about The Sun but my posts have been about this presenter and his alleged behaviour not the acceptability of tabloids covering sleaze, they've covered sleaze since they've existed. I think it can be distasteful at times but on other occasions, it can serve the public interest.

I'd ask again though that you stop lying and address things I've said directly, it's not feigning incomprehension to ask for clarity when you've already demonstrated earlier in the thread that you're happy to make straw-man arguments on my behalf. Why the aversion to dealing with what I posted instead of continually coming back with more vague rants/arguments partly based on your own assumptions?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom