Don't know about reinstated, but a lot of lawyers on different media today, all say he got a very very good case to go after the Sun for the lies they told,So you think he will be reinstated with a slap on the wrist and sue The Sun?
Don't know about reinstated, but a lot of lawyers on different media today, all say he got a very very good case to go after the Sun for the lies they told,So you think he will be reinstated with a slap on the wrist and sue The Sun?
So it's gone from 'Rod Liddle, he worked for the BBC and wrote this, what a grubby nonce' to 'Well, it's satire, innit' after it was mentioned he now writes for The Sun and is the associate editor of The Spectator?alternatively could it perhaps just be a form of satire? i mean.... the whole piece sounds like more a joke article than a factual piece.
i think it is possible he could sue the Sun if the underage thing is not true.... but i dont see how his position is tenable either way even if he WAS innocent such is the court of public opinion and the insistence that "even if he didnt do X, he probably did Y and i thing that is immoral". (or to coin a phrase.. .where there is smoke there is fire.)So you think he will be reinstated with a slap on the wrist and sue The Sun?
Stoopid Sexy Flanders!Same. LMAO
The pose is hilarious
Reminds of Ned Flander's "Feels like I'm wearing, nothing at all"....except he really isn't
This did give me a Chuckle.
not from me....i despise the sun and Spectator .... and like i said , i do not doubt he is not a nice person AND i think the article in the Sun was a disgrace, but i do not care who he works for i just commented that that to me doesnt read like a literal piece...... not without more context anyway. I could be wrong however, hence the question mark!.So it's gone from 'Rod Liddle, he worked for the BBC and wrote this, what a grubby nonce' to 'Well, it's satire, innit' after it was mentioned he now writes for The Sun and is the associate editor of The Spectator?
There's not enough back pedalling gifs for this
So you think he will be reinstated with a slap on the wrist and sue The Sun?
Apologies, wasn't aimed directly at you but rather the wider audience and what's unfolded etc. Arguably i should have aimed it at @Minusorange given they were the one that mentioned the BBC etc.not from me....
fair enough..... i just didnt want to be lumped in with the Sun defending lot!.Apologies, wasn't aimed directly at you but rather the wider audience and what's unfolded etc. Arguably i should have aimed it at @Minusorange given they were the one that mentioned the BBC etc.
unfortunately we are about 6 months too late to do that!.What he chooses to do about that, you'll need to ask Mystic Meg.
I think his job has been sabotaged by the incompetent and damaging claims which fell apart.
I also say because The Sun presented the incompetent and damaging claims which sabotaged his job, they have a case to answer.
What he chooses to do about that, you'll need to ask Mystic Meg.
We're up to half a dozen BBC "claims" which are looking increasingly tawdry without the original claim standing up but the severity of the claims are on a totally different scale.
(like clarkson)
If Sun has any sense they'll issue an apology to pre-empt any legal action (partially in anticipation of potential punitive fines for MGN in ongoing hacking trial - cost them 1Bn so far)
Did she leave any information about it?unfortunately we are about 6 months too late to do that!.
I think he will resign before the enquiry concludes and won't sue anyone because he won't want it raked up in court - I await his denial explanation statement with bated breath.. and suspect there will be further allegations..
Anyone with an ounce of professionalism would have resigned just off the back of the snapchat pic* given their position would be untenable but anyway..
*assuming its real..
He's on the line to lose a 400k a year job over a newspaper printing an incompetent story, that's worth getting the handbags out for.
Speculatively.
Huw presents that he's been defamed and claims libel has been done.
The Sun has to present that they had a good reason to print a story despite having zero agreement from the "victim".
The mind boggles at how The Sun can defend this. Did they bet everything on a real story appearing if they slandered Huw on their front page?
How can you libel someone that you didn't identify....
Maybe he could try the Kevin Spacey 'big flirt' defence..
Kevin Spacey trial latest: Emotional actor says world 'exploded' within days after assault allegations
Kevin Spacey has told his sexual assault trial that his world “exploded” in 2017 when allegations first emerged against him on the internet.www.telegraph.co.uk
WORKING FOR THE BBC!Lets wait until he gets charged with sexual assault before we turn the heat up even more.
So anyway @n111ck what are Edwards crimes here exactly, can you give us a run through?