Soldato
well that made me do a bit of a WTF
The Huw Edwards situation
- Thread starter Participant
- Start date
- Status
Wait. This is the young persons lawyer??The 'victim' has a lawyer who has released a statement saying the claims are rubbish
'Nothing inappropriate' in BBC presenter row - young person's lawyer
Claims being made by the mother at the heart of the BBC presenter row are "rubbish", a lawyer says.www.bbc.co.uk
In other words there are without-prejudice conversations going on behind the scenes about a settlement, and saying this is a condition.The 'victim' has a lawyer who has released a statement saying the claims are rubbish
'Nothing inappropriate' in BBC presenter row - young person's lawyer
Claims being made by the mother at the heart of the BBC presenter row are "rubbish", a lawyer says.www.bbc.co.uk
Man of Honour
Well if thats's true I hope whoever has been accused is going to be going after the Sun
Soldato
Of course it's that cesspit the sun that started this bs.
Last edited:
Soldato
The 'victim' has a lawyer who has released a statement saying the claims are rubbish
'Nothing inappropriate' in BBC presenter row - young person's lawyer
Claims being made by the mother at the heart of the BBC presenter row are "rubbish", a lawyer says.www.bbc.co.uk
That's gonna make it rather awkward for a few people if they have to row back on what they've said.
What a mess.
Soldato
Bit weird this one.
Soldato
Or as we have said the point at which anything really happened the person was 18, and a consenting adult.
The thing I don’t understand is why is the BBC involved in this case? Surely the parents of the child involved would have gone to the police with any evidence? Why would the employer of the accused be involved in this unless they’d been contacted by the police directly? It sounds like the parents contacted the BBC directly which seems like an odd thing to do?
Also, isn’t this person innocent until proven guilty? At the moment these are only allegations? Surely until the police have investigated this is effectively a non-story?
is it just me or doesn’t this this entire story and the circumstances around it seem a bit strange?
Also, isn’t this person innocent until proven guilty? At the moment these are only allegations? Surely until the police have investigated this is effectively a non-story?
is it just me or doesn’t this this entire story and the circumstances around it seem a bit strange?
Last edited:
Soldato
Crackhead mum trying it on to make a quick buck.
Last edited:
Yeah some knuckles definitely have to be rapped over this. If they've literally taken what the mother has said, and just have a picture of the guy in his underwear - that's hardly much proof and it's caused a media storm.
Permabanned
Slurping on 2 BBC’s that’s quite a feat.
Soldato
The fact the parents went to the sun before the cops, says it all.
Soldato
Or it was all just BS.
In any case surely it need’s investigating still, settlement or not.
Soldato
Falling on deaf ears with these type of people but I hope anyone slinging mud about this towards various people take stock and change their behaviour for the future.
Doubtful though as people are dicks
Doubtful though as people are dicks
Soldato
this game is pay to win
That’s what seems off about this whole thing. Why on Earth did the parents contact the BBC before speaking to the police?
The BBC had to become involved once the Sun had published an article claiming that a BBC presenter had been accused of a potential crime. All they would probably have done is spoken to the accused to get their side of events, and then get in touch with the police - which they had done.
The person is innocent until proven guilty, hence the lack of identity being published. The police still had to investigate as there was an accusation made that this presenter had explicit pictures of what's essentially a child.
Yeah it definitely sounds more like this.
- Status