Soldato
If you read a lot you should be aware that the conclusive scientific consensus is that human activity has led to the substantial increase in global temperatures.
The impending environmental disaster
- Thread starter 413x
- Start date
If you read a lot you should be aware that the conclusive scientific consensus is that human activity has led to the substantial increase in global temperatures.
Soldato
That would help in terms of emissions of pollutants, but it wouldn't necessarily help with overall greenhouse gas emissions because electric cars are not green. Their power is just generated elsewhere.
They continue to exist whether they're in the UK or not. We'd just be displacing the problem.
I'm sure a future war with China will help the excessive human problem.
Even this says having fewer kids reduces carbon. But it's bad for humanity.
Yeah, carbon isn't everything particularly on a personal level as @dLockers keeps reminding us all. The UK has trashed its natural environment and we could be doing a lot more to help nature rebuild in this country. But.... But China..
Caporegime
We need the third world to have our western existence. If everyone was on the same level you couldn't have all your cheap tat that we have now. Everyone wants their cake and eat it.
How many people are willing to give that up? The percentage is very small.
This.
Imagine everyone being the average American. The world would just die. Its impossible.
Specifically of young kids, especially babies. Every baby you kill saves 58.6 tonnes of carbon.
This is true.
Per year they would have lived.
Permabanned
since ? you mean the so called 90k surveys ? to tom dick and harry ? cmip 5 and 95% of the other models are wrong it's been proven .. when real data does not follow a model ie: the hockey stick .. no where near btw ..
go read some of the new stuff in Nature
the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics or The Heartland Institute’s 2013 NIPCC report stated that the earth “has not warmed significantly for the past 16 years despite an 8% increase in atmospheric CO2.”
Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Science study using observational data rather than computer climate models concluded that “the models are exaggerating climate sensitivity” and overestimate how fast the earth will warm as CO2 levels increase
Two other studies using observational data found that IPCC projections of future global warming are too high. [76] [97] Climatologist and former NASA scientist Roy Spencer, PhD, concluded that 95% of climate models have “over-forecast the warming trend since 1979.” [77] According to Emeritus Professor of Geography at the University of Winnipeg, Tim Ball, PhD, “IPCC computer climate models are the vehicles of deception… [T]hey create the results they are designed to produce.”
it's a real eye opener i'm hoping yours will open soon ..
Seeing as you quoted NASA im sure you will love this
There is a nice graph in there showing the warming as well, I dont see how you will dispute it.
I think people like flea find a few papers that dispute consensus, push those out and ignore the majority. Its a bizarre mindset but its similar to conspiracy theory types who select a few 'papers' and point to those to dispute all the others.
Soldato
Matthew Hopkins?
Well it can't be too obvious seen as nothing is being done about it.
Forgot about that! So with lets say 70 year av lifespan that will be 4,102 tonnes!
So basically what people are saying is the best environmental policy would be the Herod one> - Kill everybodies first born?
It can only be described as broken if 'working' can be described. What is your metric of 'working'? Because most graphs of human nature look like hockey sticks right now.