The Indoor Riding/ Zwift/ TrainerRoad etc. Thread

As regards max heart rate, at 48 in '22, I regular hit 185-190 when doing ~1min climb max efforts outside or sprints on zwift. I felt very comfortable averaging 175-180 for 20mins during threshold efforts.

Once I got covid that became long covid in autumn '22, it's been very rare I've hit 180+ and averaging 155-160 for 20mins has been just as rare. But surprisingly, I hit 180-184 in three of last Weekend's Tiny Races.
 
Ooooh been a while since I checked in here. I've ended up racing in 'A pen' of Zwift Games as my damn Racing Score is 513... Top pen for 'Range 1' of the Games is 500-650 score! :cry:

Needless to say I got my head kicked in (I'm a mid or upper Cat B at best) last Tuesday. Somehow holding onto the Pack all the way, fumes and chasing dusty shadows on the climb, managed to the close the gap and get back onto the back of the group for the finish. 75th place! But only as it was a short and flat one... Annoyingly I didn't lose any racing score, so I'm ready for more of the same later, this time up the Volcano so I'm expecting to come dead last...! :eek::cry:

Checked out the results and thought you came first! Turns out it was another Haydn. What are the odds eh.
 
Yeah but what he's saying is the chemo is having such a massive strain on his body the massive effort it was taking his heart when riding hard was pushing it way over what he would expect. Even the 150/160bpm on a 2w/kg ride is pretty high. I've got guys I ride with similar ages and they max out at 140-150.

Hitting 195 wouldn't be 'normal' for the vast majority of anyone over their 20's or 30's - but HR is such an individual thing, so always exceptions... Like this guy I've Zwifted with - he's in his early 30's and regularly hits 200bpm.

But totally right about doing something, great effort! Take things steady @dod - but also fantastic you're feeling well enough to want to ride your bike. No pressure on any performance while going through chemo! It'll be brilliant if you just keep your legs spinning. Goodluck!
exactly that. My resting heart rate was in the low 50's normally with occasional drops into high 40's. A 2W/kg usually saw me in the high 120's/ 130's and a good hill climb (Col de rates) would see me pushing 180 . Now RHR is in the high 70's low 80's and BP is also elevated.

Oncologist explained it in pretty much your terms. Chemo is essentially a pretty strong poison and the body is trying to fight that. While they encourage exercise I was trying to duplicate what I was doing before and it's just not realistic.
 
Yeah my HR now (I'm 44) I can still hit 190 and have that set as my 'max'. Only really see it or a few beats over when really rested on a total 'end of race' effort. 95% the rest of the time mid 180's is my top and 'blow up' territory (unrecoverable).

Resting HR around 42-45 fatigued then up to 45-50. I don't really 'see' below 100bpm on the bike, most of the riding I do seeing it 'dip' between efforts to 120ish sometimes a bit lower. Generally the fitter I am the quicker and a bit lower it'll dip between those race type efforts, then when more fatigued the harder it is to 'get it up' (stop sniggering) when I want to be in the zone... In my early 30's when I started riding I couldn't get it above 160 then as I got fitter it got higher and higher. Maybe up to 200 once or twice, but certainly the last few years (7-8+) have considered 190 my 'max HR' only seeing it a few times.

Checked out the results and thought you came first! Turns out it was another Haydn. What are the odds eh.
Haha yeah, he's my hero *dreamy eyes*

Also - I'm not The Only One! How amazing is that!? Most of the others spelling it the same way as me (not Hayden) tend to be Americans :D
 
  • Haha
Reactions: fez
So I plucked up the courage to conduct a ramp FTP in Rouvy over lunch today and I am suitably humbled! I managed an FTP of 150 Watts, up from the 114, estimated by Rouvy based on the two weeks of owning the trainer. Being honest, I even found the warmup of 100 Watts a little tough and I'm surprised I got the start of the 5th Ramp (220W). I'm planning on starting the Rouvy FTP training course and taking it from there.
 
So I plucked up the courage to conduct a ramp FTP in Rouvy over lunch today and I am suitably humbled! I managed an FTP of 150 Watts, up from the 114, estimated by Rouvy based on the two weeks of owning the trainer. Being honest, I even found the warmup of 100 Watts a little tough and I'm surprised I got the start of the 5th Ramp (220W). I'm planning on starting the Rouvy FTP training course and taking it from there.
Check your turbo model, the wild swings in temperature these last few days will play havok with power readings when the turbo isn't calibrated.
 
So I plucked up the courage to conduct a ramp FTP in Rouvy over lunch today and I am suitably humbled! I managed an FTP of 150 Watts, up from the 114, estimated by Rouvy based on the two weeks of owning the trainer. Being honest, I even found the warmup of 100 Watts a little tough and I'm surprised I got the start of the 5th Ramp (220W). I'm planning on starting the Rouvy FTP training course and taking it from there.

Good effort. Don't worry about where you are starting from honestly. You are putting in the work and unlike some people I could mention on here, doing ramp tests like a real man :p

I've found that the sort of stuff I do on the trainer didn't estimate my FTP particularly well once I started getting a bit fitter so personally I think occasional ramp tests are vital. Theres a big debate about how accurate FTP tests are but I have always found them to be excellent for basing all the workouts on when it comes to percentages of FTP and how hard that makes them vs how hard they should be.

Good luck!
 
So I plucked up the courage to conduct a ramp FTP in Rouvy over lunch today and I am suitably humbled! I managed an FTP of 150 Watts, up from the 114, estimated by Rouvy based on the two weeks of owning the trainer. Being honest, I even found the warmup of 100 Watts a little tough and I'm surprised I got the start of the 5th Ramp (220W). I'm planning on starting the Rouvy FTP training course and taking it from there.
Good work & well done for crossing it off. As mentioned not impossible the ramp 'over-estimates', but also it's just a measure so you have one. 150 being a much better number to work with than something estimated, an actual accurate number!

So use that, FTP only really being used to base training intervals/levels from, nothing else. When you're putting in some longer efforts (10+ mins) and you feel like you're capable of riding and sustaining over your FTP then it's worth doing the 20 min test. It's a different beast - far more accurate for longer intervals or endurance riding, if that's an interest for you.

I'm very much a punchy racer who goes well uphill. So that is what I do - I get bored doing training plans or intervals so I don't do them. Those shorter blocks of power in a race are my intervals, they engage me far more. I ride a lot of TTT's (I organise 4 teams and lead 1 weekly in the WTRL Thursday TTT) and sweep group rides, so am regularly riding 1-2-3-4 minute efforts over my FTP (sometimes a long way!) for my training. But put me onto a real hill to do a long 20+ min effort it's a massive difference. Even the Volcano climb in that link is a little too long for me (7-8 mins), but in a race, I'm capable of riding it well.

But even when I'm riding well - my FTP up-to 274W in this race on 4th Feb, when I jumped into a long iTT later that month which actually required an hour effort at around FTP, the best I could manage was 244W for an hour. I was much closer the first 30 mins - but still 'only' 264W. It's really because I don't do long solid efforts like that - but put me into a punchy race on a hard course, maybe I could get the average to near my FTP. If you're riding longer efforts, you get better at them - who knew! ;)

I've found that the sort of stuff I do on the trainer didn't estimate my FTP particularly well once I started getting a bit fitter so personally I think occasional ramp tests are vital.
I'm proof of that! But as I'm not doing training plans or anything like that - just having fun and riding hard on top of a long term good base fitness, I don't need an accurate FTP figure... My zFTP in my Zwiftpower profile is 265W and although I've not done tests that has all along felt more accurate than the ones Zwift gives me (it's always a bit lower).
 
No idea what I did wrong but I tried a ride with Zwift virtual shifting and it felt terrible.
Id shift up and it would spike the power then get easier.
This was with the multi sequential one chosen 1-24 gears.
Also is it possible to get a smaller cog for the Zwift Cog would any 11t standard Freehub cog work.
 
Last edited:
No idea what I did wrong but I tried a ride with Zwift virtual shifting and it felt terrible.
Id shift up and it would spike the power then get easier.
This was with the multi sequential one chosen 1-24 gears.
Also is it possible to get a smaller cog for the Zwift Cog would any 11t standard Freehub cog work.

You deffo not in ERG mode because that sounds exactly how it behaves in ERG mode for me. Spikes the power because it suddenly mimics a harder gear but then ERG adjusts the resistance to make that gear hit the target power.
 
You deffo not in ERG mode because that sounds exactly how it behaves in ERG mode for me. Spikes the power because it suddenly mimics a harder gear but then ERG adjusts the resistance to make that gear hit the target power.
So I need to remove the trainer from control?
 
So I need to remove the trainer from control?
No, I think that means the trainer will be aware of changes in gradient and such. Kind of the link between the Zwift software and the trainer. You need to check the trainer isn't in ERG. In ERG, it will be trying to keep you at X Watts. Obviously, if you change gear, it changes the resistance so you will suddenly be pushing more/less watts and the bike will need to adjust things to get you back to X watts. In non-ERG, it's more like manual mode.
 
No, I think that means the trainer will be aware of changes in gradient and such. Kind of the link between the Zwift software and the trainer. You need to check the trainer isn't in ERG. In ERG, it will be trying to keep you at X Watts. Obviously, if you change gear, it changes the resistance so you will suddenly be pushing more/less watts and the bike will need to adjust things to get you back to X watts. In non-ERG, it's more like manual mode.
I'll have a look for the setting when I next ride. I do usually either do a Zwift workout or control it via the wahoo app and just set say 200w.
 
I'll have a look for the setting when I next ride. I do usually either do a Zwift workout or control it via the wahoo app and just set say 200w.

Right, so if you are setting it to 200w then you are using ERG mode where it will vary the resistance to make sure that no matter what gear you are in you will be pushing 200w. It won't work when you first start peddling as you need to get the flywheel up to speed but after that it will do its best to keep you at that wattage. If you change up or down gears to make it harder/easier then you will feel it get easier for a few seconds before the ERG mode either adds or reduces resistance to compensate. Zwift workouts are all based on ERG I think.
 
Right, so if you are setting it to 200w then you are using ERG mode where it will vary the resistance to make sure that no matter what gear you are in you will be pushing 200w. It won't work when you first start peddling as you need to get the flywheel up to speed but after that it will do its best to keep you at that wattage. If you change up or down gears to make it harder/easier then you will feel it get easier for a few seconds before the ERG mode either adds or reduces resistance to compensate. Zwift workouts are all based on ERG I think.
I didn't set it to anything this ride just jumped on a route and started riding.
The route incline dictated the power I was riding the sprinters route. Before the virtual gears my real gears worked as expected this way but now virtual gears just don't seem right.
 
I didn't set it to anything this ride just jumped on a route and started riding.
The route incline dictated the power I was riding the sprinters route. Before the virtual gears my real gears worked as expected this way but now virtual gears just don't seem right.

Sorry, its still quite hard to tell what exactly is happening. So you are on what they call a "free ride" where there is no ERG, your gears work as they would outside and are affected by the incline/decline of the terrain making it feel easier/harder in combination with your gear choice.

What is happening when you change gears that you don't think should be?
 
Sorry, its still quite hard to tell what exactly is happening. So you are on what they call a "free ride" where there is no ERG, your gears work as they would outside and are affected by the incline/decline of the terrain making it feel easier/harder in combination with your gear choice.

What is happening when you change gears that you don't think should be.
Start the session in what ever gear is default Gear 8 I think. Pedal and it's about 90w change up to o gear 10 and it's 140w or so then drops back down to like 100w, gear 20 and still at like 100-140w.
All on 0% incline.

I expected the gears to be more useful and say 20w to 50w jumps.
 
Start the session in what ever gear is default Gear 8 I think. Pedal and it's about 90w change up to o gear 10 and it's 140w or so then drops back down to like 100w, gear 20 and still at like 100-140w.
All on 0% incline.

I expected the gears to be more useful and say 20w to 50w jumps.

Hmm, the only thing I can think is that its configured poorly. You can set trainer difficulty on zwift but I don't think that does anything but kill the gradients. What have you got the virtual shifting set up to represent. Do you have to set it up and say "I want a 50/34 and an 11-34 setup"

Whats the trainer you are on?
 
Last edited:
Hmm, the only thing I can think is that its configured poorly. You can set trainer difficulty on zwift but I don't think that does anything but kill the gradients. What have you got the virtual shifting set up to represent. Do you have to set it up and say "I want a 50/34 and an 11-34 setup"

Whats the trainer you are on?
Kickr Core with the latest firmware.
Mixed Terrain 1-24 Sequential.

I'll try the difficulty thing but like you say I think that's just for gradients, worth a try though.

I need to look at getting a smaller cog as well. Hoping this fits.

The Zwift Cog is too big paired with my 34t it doesn't feel very smooth to pedal anymore.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom