I have no doubt that JM could do a lot better, and be a lot more positive - but so could the board.
Lets face it - they ***** up over Perisic last summer, and all season that side of attack was dreadful (not helped by the aging and useless Valencia), they have also ballsed up this transfer window by acting so slowly and penny pinching here and there......
Did they **** it up or were they simply not willing to pay such a big fee on a 28 year old? Iirc, you were very much against Utd spending so much on him last summer. As I said in my reply to Loki, the board's job is to make funds available but make sure they're not spent recklessly. They have to draw the line somewhere.
He wanted "4 specialists" in his first summer and he said Utd could challenge for the title - he got them all at huge expense. He was then given huge money again the following summer, including spending a big fee on an aging Matic. You then signed another aging player in Sanchez, on a hugely expensive contract. If two positions Mourinho still wants players in are as what's being reported, CB & winger, then it's easy to understand why the board aren't willing to spend huge fees, especially if they don't believe they're getting value - whether that be due to age or quality. As I asked Loki, if you were running the finances at Utd would you not be slightly concerned about spending a huge fee on another CB, having already bought two expensive CB's in the previous 2 summers? Would you not be worried about spending £50m+ on Perisic or Willian, having already brought in Sanchez, knowing that in a couple of years they're going to need replacing again?
Even Man City, with all their oil money would need to put a leesh on Mourinho. Mourinho will spend every penny available to him and as I touched on in my reply to Loki, he's not even that fussed about who he signs - Mourinho said himself, for one position he identifies 5 possible targets. If he can't get the 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th, he'll happily sign the 5th choice and will no doubt look to replace them in 6 or 12 months time.
I'm not saying Liverpool's system is right and Utd's is wrong, it's how they're implemented that is most important but the difference in the way Liverpool and Utd have done their business this summer is night and day and the reason why is because at Liverpool (something we've not had for a long time) we have got owners, board, sporting director and manager all working together. Utd, certainly from the outside, appear to lack any clear, long term strategy to their transfer dealings and if the manager and those controlling the budget aren't on the same page you're going to end up missing out on targets and wasting money.