Because they are simply the property owners. If the market is too scary for them, and god forbid, someone lives there who cooks curry or has an unmowed lawn - then they should stick their money somewhere safer.
Can you not discern that from what you've quoted? Do you have a point to make woth your posts, or are you just bored?
If that's your idea of a nightmare tenant, it shows how little knowledge you have of the rental market.
Protections for anything actually serious already exist.If that's your idea of a nightmare tenant, it shows how little knowledge you have of the rental market.
no but it is my property...... and p.....g off the neighbours is my problem. I dont even know why you are defending this. It isnt a big ask to keep on top of a property and if the tenants are not happy to do that then that is on them. if they are incapable of that then they need to go to a council run shelter.
Removing a non paying tenant and recovering any money is a long, drawn out and expensive process. There is often no recourse to get the majority of the money or time back. That's why landlords generally like to check that the person they are going to rent to is able to pay, or likely to. It's not rocket science.
Right, but cooking meth versus having a neighbor texting you because the tenant hasn't mowed the lawn are very different concepts lol.
Don't play the game if the game is too scary.
one of our tenants disconnected the heating, blocked up all the airvents and flooded the shop below them.
haha. Enjoy your fish finger tea tonight dLockers, nice chatting with you today!
jesus christ man..... so now you are trying to say those of us wanting a tenant to look after the property they rent are in the same pot as racists who dont want a foreigner living in their pad? FFS!. No wonder these threads get heated with people like you coming out with this crap
What was racist about that? I can swap the word curry for smelly food if that makes you feel less offended?
Of course it's for my own personal gain.
