The Manchester United Club Thread **Sponsored by Comedy Central**

I think INEOS certainly give off a pretty ruthless vibe, they are driven almost entirely by data. The data will not look good for ETH.
 
I can see why some people want to give him the benefit of the doubt. I mean all he needs is his first choice defence available, right? Like when we had Shaw/Martinez/Varane/Dalot at the back and lost... err... 7-0 to Liverpool. Right.

Or this season, when our strongest XI struggled against Newport County. Just a one-off, surely.

I was thinking about this last night. Considering Europa League games are on Thursday wouldn't it be better to miss out on European competition for a season so we haven't got the Thursday/Saturday issue with matches plus with fewer games we could have a smaller squad which is what is likely to happen? A smaller squad with fewer games to play (league + FA and League cup games) and promote some of the youth players because they can't be any worse than some of the current first team.

I think the additional revenue is significant, and we should be able to manage. We've had no European midweek games for the second half of this season and our form has got worse if anything!
 
Manager thoughts, assuming ETH goes:

I will caveat this by saying I consider ETH a failure and don't particularly rate him as a coach, so most managers are a potential improvement.

I would be delighted with Pochettino, I've always been a fan and while he hasn't set the world alight in terms of trophies, he's never had the ideal setting for it - yet. Man Utd would be a great project if INEOS can work something out with him.

Tuchel I am on the fence about, he seems more of a short term manager and not really someone you'd choose for a longer term project. I think it's less likely.

De Zerbi would be interesting, more of an unknown quantity, but he's done well at Brighton overall.

Potter is a bit meh, but he was highly rated and in a similar sort of situation to De Zerbi.

Southgate surely can't happen.
 
INEOS might well view Poch as the man to get the best out of the likes of Rashford and Sancho, too.

Neville was saying years ago he seems the most logical fit for Man Utd manager in many ways - and I thought the same.
 
I agree the players need an overhaul too - but that is easier said than done. Many are on huge contracts.

Just because the players are problematic doesn't mean we should stick with a busted flush of a manager too.
 
What a comical overreaction, refusing to watch if we hire Pochettino, yet calling Ten Hag impeccable while ignoring the fact he's just overseen the worst season in our recent history.

I don't even...
 
To be fair to Adam, he didn't say ETH was impeccable this season. Not sure why you feel the need to strawman him Robbo when he does a good enough job defeating himself in an argument most of the time.

What was impeccable about his first season? Bearing in mind what the word means - faultless.

He won what is realistically a second rate trophy that nobody is really bothered about. Not a bad thing but not a big deal either.

Final league position was good, all things considered. Losing 7-0 to Liverpool was a huge low point - a result so bad that people have erased it from memory!

So yes, it was a decent enough season, but nothing more. He's since had a full year of coaching the players, and working out what to do. And now look where we are... this season has been a complete horror show.

Thankfully I am fairly confident INEOS just want the cup final out of the way, and he'll get his marching orders.
 
Ten Hag's experience is primarily with Ajax though, and he did well there, but they are the biggest team in that league. Yes I appreciate they hadn't won it in prior seasons, but turning them around is hardly an underdog story that points to greatness.

PSG are a mess really so I wouldn't write Poch off on that basis - he did win the 21/22 season by a big margin. I think he's finished quite strongly in a very difficult environment at Chelsea, and his Spurs side were never likely to win much as it's Spurs!

The reality is we don't really know how the club is being run in any detail. INEOS appear to be attempting to install the best people possible at every position in the club. I think they'll consider ETH a failure and want their own manager - it may be someone from left field, a bit like Liverpool with Slot.
 
I wanted ETH and hoped he would do well, but he's fallen off a cliff this season and I doubt he'll be able to pull himself back up. It doesn't really happen these days, when a manager plumbs new depths, they don't generally recover.

Even if he was doing quite well, I think there's a fair chance INEOS would boot him to get their own man in. The fact he's been atrocious this season (even accounting for injuries etc) makes it almost an inevitability.

I do think there's a slim chance it could all hang on the FA Cup. Winning that would mean a trophy plus Europa League, but again, it probably won't matter. Massively unlikely we win it anyway. Plus, they'd likely have to give him a new contract to keep him which makes it even less likely.

If we're just comparing trophies, you should be desperate for Tuchel. Wipes the floor with ETH in terms of silverware and prestige.
 
Pinches of salt required of course, but there are numerous semi-reliable reports we're interested in the following managers, primarily:
  • McKenna
  • Tuchel
  • Pochettino
  • Frank
On paper Tuchel is the outstanding candidate, but he may not really fit into what INEOS want to build - we don't really know what that is yet.

Apparently no firm decision made on ETH as yet, maybe an FA Cup win would swing it, but that's not likely.
 
Last edited:
Not sure happy is the right word, but I am not disappointed.

The players are equally at fault, but I have seen very little from ETH that suggests he'll be able to turn things around. This season has been a complete disaster, and you can't just blame injuries and offer nothing else.

Edit ::

Also slightly typical it leaks right on the eve of the cup final. However, that seems to be down to the interest in McKenna from other clubs. If we assume this is true, then that must mean he's the top target for INEOS.

I know he's done brilliantly at Ipswich, but it's a hell of a gamble.
 
Last edited:
I mean this is just beyond damning, what a poor situation.


Manchester United manager Erik ten Hag is preparing for the FA Cup final not knowing whether reports that he will be sacked, no matter what the result, are true.

Rumours about Ten Hag’s future intensified on Friday morning before The Guardian reported the Dutchman would lose his job in the aftermath whatever the outcome of the Wembley meeting with Manchester City on Saturday (15:00 BST).

United have refused to comment on the story.
 
Better then a manager already knowing he is sacked before a massive cup final.

In all honesty it won't make a difference here. The players weren't going to go out there and be inspired by ETH.

This could actually rally the players a bit, but the reality is we're losing no matter what happens.
 
There's a belief that giving a manager time means they can turn it around - despite very little evidence of this ever being the case. An upward trajectory is a must. 2 full seasons is a long time in football.

Just because sacking managers hasn't worked in the past either, doesn't mean you should stick with a manager who is so obviously failing.

There are 3 main elements of a club, the sporting directors and senior staff members, the manager, and the players. All three elements have generally been a failure over the past decade.

Presumably they're on with Xavi's people now, unless he's already got something lined up?

Man Utd? No sign of that as yet. Seems to be McKenna, Tuchel or Pochettino.
 
But it hasn't worked in...*checks notes*...*blink*...wow, that many, huh...right, since you last won the league you've had eight managers, including caretakers and Rangnick as an interim.

And is he so obviously failing? Or is that season actually a pretty fair reflection of where Manchester United are now?

The big change now is the ownership, the people making decisions are hopefully better. Nothing has worked since we last won the league.

I believe he's failing, yes. Forget the results for a moment, the actual performances have been dreadful.

The only thing you could say in his favour is that he did well at Ajax. Don't think that matters so much now.

I'd be amazed if they don't at least ask what his attitude to an approach would be.

Not sure he's an obvious fit, could be interesting though.
 
I could be way off but I have a sneaking suspicion they’ll stick with ETH as long as we don’t get absolutely humped today.

As I understand it, any manager coming in is going to be hampered by PSR (or whatever it’s called) this season? I could see a scenario where Ineos decide to stick with ETH, offer him the incentive of new contract talks based on performances in the first half of the season and let him clear out this squad as much as possible this season. If we’re still a car crash come January then he walks.

Could be totally wrong and he could be sacked at half time today but it’s just a niggling feeling I have.

The people in the know are convinced he's gone already. The club would have backed him in the last 24 hours or so if the press were wrong.
 
The club are offering up redundancy for almost all staff now. Set against the backdrop of no more working from home - something that's harsh IMO considering there's a lack of office space.


Manchester United’s non-football staff have been en-masse invited to take redundancy, in an email sent across the club on Tuesday afternoon.

United are giving employees just seven days to make a decision about whether they wish to continue their careers at the club.

The offering relates to all employees who are not a scout or on the playing staff, and therefore impacts some who work at the club’s Carrington training complex. Employees have been given until June 5 to decide whether to take what the club describe as “voluntary resignation”, although some employees, who wished not to be named when discussing confidential emails, argued it looked a lot more like a voluntary redundancy programme.

I wouldn't say this is unusual in terms of a business takeover, but I think some people need to understand that while Ratcliffe has presented himself as a friendly boyhood fan, he is absolutely ruthless and business matters will come first.
 
Assuming that's all true, it seems largely sensible. Modern clubs need to be structured so they can deal with a change of manager every 2-4 years.
 
I see no issues with this. This is what encourages better productivity which is critical at a football club. WFH was just a fad and always will be.

Do you mean WFH in general? Or do you mean it wasn't working at Man Utd specifically? I would argue the lower level staff are being made to suffer because of failures at the top level of the club.

It's not a fad at all.
 
Yes I do mean in general. I can guarantee the vast majority of people would increase their productivity being in the office rather than at home and I include myself in that. Far too many distractions at home.

When you think of a club like United you need everyone together to get the best imo.

Evidence largely points to the opposite, that's just an outdated, old fashioned view.

No idea how things work at Man Utd in that respect so I couldn't really comment.

I don't like the WFH policy, it's antiquated. However it seems we have a bloated workforce so I get the trying to get it back into shape.

Yep, no problem with that element of it.
 
Back
Top Bottom