Anyone have the new Canon 35mm mk2?
Thinking about upgrading, with the current cash back deal it should work out about £1k to change over. I wonder if you have it whether it is considerably better in the real world.
The one area I find the mk1 falls short is the CA, it's not a huge problem most of the time but it can be in some situations. Also now having the 5D4 with the extra resolution it might be wise to get lenses that can resolve those resolutions (or vice versa). What I gather its the Canon is undoubtedly a better 35mm, or it is the best 35mm you can get, in AF, bokeh, CA, distortion, sharpness, pretty much across the board.
Of course I could get the Sigma for much less but i read stories about it's focusing and tbh...I need to be able to trust the lens so on that front I have to rule the Sigma out. The 35mm is my most used lens by far, although it is expensive, I think it is money well spent and a worthy investment. (I guess my mind is 90% made, but would love to hear what people think if they have tried the new 35mm)
Anyone have the new Canon 35mm mk2?
Thinking about upgrading, with the current cash back deal it should work out about £1k to change over. I wonder if you have it whether it is considerably better in the real world.
The one area I find the mk1 falls short is the CA, it's not a huge problem most of the time but it can be in some situations. Also now having the 5D4 with the extra resolution it might be wise to get lenses that can resolve those resolutions (or vice versa). What I gather its the Canon is undoubtedly a better 35mm, or it is the best 35mm you can get, in AF, bokeh, CA, distortion, sharpness, pretty much across the board.
Of course I could get the Sigma for much less but i read stories about it's focusing and tbh...I need to be able to trust the lens so on that front I have to rule the Sigma out. The 35mm is my most used lens by far, although it is expensive, I think it is money well spent and a worthy investment. (I guess my mind is 90% made, but would love to hear what people think if they have tried the new 35mm)
The sigma 35mm is optimized for sharpness over out-of-focus rendering so I would have a close look at some examples. The other issue I would have as a serious pro is Sigma lenses wont give the same colors and rendition as canon. This tends to be a bigger issue for you rather than your clients who aren't so engaged. in such matters.
The mechanical construction is beyond impressive. This lens is massively over-engineered compared to any other prime we’ve ever disassembled. It’s built like a tank where it counts; on the inside.
We take apart A LOT of lenses (we passed 20,000 in-house repairs some time ago) and this is the most impressively built prime I’ve seen. This is an engineer’s lens.
If I had to summarize the mechanical design of this lens, I would say simply that no expense was spared, no corner was cut.
Sometimes things are expensive because they’re worth it. Sometimes they’re heavy because they’re so solidly constructed. This is one of those times.
Canon have been slowly increasing their lens quality. You can also see form the lenrentals reviews that newer Canon lenses are being built with much tighter tolerances so there is less lens to lens variances. Nikon look to be doing the same but are some way behind Canon at this point.
It makes sense since Sigma and Tamron are now offering lenses optical as good Canon and Nikon can no longer sell lenses at high prices purely on optics. Of Course Sigma and Tamron have improved their quality a lot but Canon and nikon want to be a level up
Can't complain about the Sigma 35mm, not noticed any AF issues and it's ridiculously sharp. Focuses better on my D610 than the Nikon primes i have. There's certainly no way i could have justified spending an extra £1000 on the Nikon 35mm instead. Build quality seems fine for me, i'm not a pro lugging kit around all day though...
Nice. How are you getting along with the MkIV Raymond? I've been umming and aahing over one to complement my 1DX.
Be interested to hear your thoughts on the new 35 Raymond. I went for the Sigma myself, couldn't justify the extra on the new Canon, or the older one second hand to be fair. I agree with your above stats, clearly by far your most used lens and also as you said it will count towards your CPS list.
The 5d4 is amazing.Nice. How are you getting along with the MkIV Raymond? I've been umming and aahing over one to complement my 1DX.
Does it not just show the large portrait shaped AF point as live view on older models by default then?
Right. I've just been messing with LV stills on the 1DXII but while it puts the af point where I want it with the touchscreen I still have to hit my af button (AF-On for BB focus) to af. RTFM time I think.