The "New Gear/Willy Waving" thread

Seems to be fine in video but with stills I have to hit the AF button.

Edit: I hadn't really read up on this beforehand and it wasn't a reason for buying the camera anyway so not a big deal. Had some more time with it and LV focus is so quick now compared to previous bodies, night and day, tracks nicely as well. Also shot some 1080p video last night at my little owl site so that may be something I use more. ISO seems slightly better than 1DX (DPP's noise defaults are in the same ballpark as my own settings for the 1DX) and the ability to pull up underexposed files is very noticeably better.
 
Last edited:
I've bought a Pentax K5 to upgrade from the KX with better low light capabilities. My current lenses include the 18-55 kit lens, Sigma APO 70-300mm and the Pentax 1.8 50mm.
I was looking at the Pentax WR 18-135mm, has anyone any experience with this one? A wide range of zoom in some shoots that I get is more handy than swapping between the kit lens and sigma.
 
Bought a few items over the last few weeks to try and remove my one excuse for not taking my camera everywhere (size).

Lens - Canon 35mm 2.8
Pouch from amazon - save me using my annoyingly large camera bag.
Hand strap - previously used a neck strap which I hated
Bootleg gorilla pod from china
Cheap ball head from Amazon

I think I've used my camera more in the last couple of weeks than I did in the whole of 2016!

4kl0eRs.jpg
 
Needed a camera for video with autofocus. Already heavily invested in Canon DSLR's so bit the bullet and bought a Canon 80D. Not the fastest or most accurate system but it's more effective than the live view focus on older cameras, the speed is good for continuous shooting. The touch screen focus allows the user to select focus points with ease. Very happy with it as my "hand it to someone else to get a second angle" camera.
 
If the mk2 isn't available I would have got the Sigma, or if I had the Sigma I can't see myself getting the Canon either.

FWIW, I had the Sigma and swapped it out for the Mk2. I loved the Sigma and, on a bang-for-buck scale, it's unbeatable but I had a couple of minor niggles with it. It would miss focus now and then (not often but enough) and I didn't like that it wasn't weather sealed. By comparison the Canon is just a little bit better in all aspects. Slightly better IQ, slightly better AF, slightly better bokeh, slightly better build quality.
 
I presume the 5D4 is only semi-auto like the 5D3? Appreciate it's not Reikan's fault but it sure makes it more tedious. With the 6D I can just leave it.
 
I presume the 5D4 is only semi-auto like the 5D3? Appreciate it's not Reikan's fault but it sure makes it more tedious. With the 6D I can just leave it.

Click calibrate and it ask you to change it to -20, -10, +10, +20. (If you start at 0 so the first set of shots is 0). Then it tells you the final result.

So I have to do that 5 times for each lens, times 9, times 2. With the zooms having to do it twice, once each at the extremes.

To save me moving the tripod again and again I did one lens with both bodies before moving on to next lens so keep having to change the tripod plate every time too.

I also ran out of room so at 100mm and 135mm I was shoot from living room into the kitchen.
 
That's what I do with my 6D
I'm still amazed Canon and Nikon haven't released there own versions it can't be hard to do and they could make it fully automated and brand specific, people love to pay extra money for OEM stuff so they'd clean up. Then I guess much of what big companies do baffles me like Nikon without a sensible csc and canon with an eos-m lens line up that has more holes then filler.
 
Back
Top Bottom