Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Link please somebody?
nVidia Vulkan Driver 364.91 Beta
Win 7/8/8.1 x32 :
https://developer.nvidia.com/win7win832bit
Win 7/8/8.1 x64 :
https://developer.nvidia.com/win7win864bit
Win 10 x32 :
https://developer.nvidia.com/win1032bit
Win 10 x64 :
https://developer.nvidia.com/win1064bit
https://developer.nvidia.com/vulkan-driver
DriverVer = 04/08/2016, 10.18.13.6491
Updated Vulkan API to 1.0.8
Improve pipeline creation performance and multi-threaded scaling
Increase our maximum bound descriptor sets from 4 to 8
Add support for asynchronous transfer queue
Improve VK_EXT_debug_report messages on incorrect API usage and shader compile failure
Fix VkImageFormatProperties maxMipLevels property
Reduce VkPhysicalDeviceLimits bufferImageGranularity requirement on GM20x GPUs
Improve Vulkan support on Optimus platforms
Fixes for minor driver and SPIR-V compiler bugs
One of the problems with Fermi (though it also affects first generation Kepler to a degree) the hardware is lacking certain functionality for running stuff in parallel and other instruction scheduling stuff that kills a lot of DX12 features and/or means emulating them without any performance gain from using them.
That isn't a problem with Fermi, it's an architecture from years before DX12 was considered. The problem is that at DX12 launch Nvidia stood up on stage proclaiming to the world that everything from Fermi upwards would support it. Rumours that the DX12 spec was lowered so that Fermi could be included and would be the base line level of DX12 support. Nvidia have spent the past what is it, 2+ years lying about Fermi's ability to run DX12 and since Windows 10 launch when Fermi DX12 drivers failed to materialise they didn't admit it couldn't, they lied, lied and lied again about delays and how support was coming shortly, then later, then end of the year, etc, etc.
Fermi doesn't support DX12, fine, Nvidia lying about it supporting DX12 is the issue. Let's just wait for some async drivers for the rest of the line up, because Nvidia has also delayed those but insists it supports it and it will come eventually.
Nvidia have spent the past what is it, 2+ years lying about Fermi's ability to run DX12 and since Windows 10 launch when Fermi DX12 drivers failed to materialise they didn't admit it couldn't, they lied, lied and lied again about delays and how support was coming shortly, then later, then end of the year, etc, etc..
Are these available on Nvidia's site via the driver selection? I can't seem to find them.
I though windows 10 had been out for 8 months ?, I better update my clocks to 2018!
It is sucky nvidia lied or just chose not to do it, but how many people relay is it going to affect the number of Windows 10 users running a Fermi GPU let alone one powerfull enought for it to matter (say a 480/580) is going to so small that nvidia probably though it not worth to cash to do it and then maintain the support.
At least with Vulkun this seems to be the case https://youtu.be/nGkpPp2tGSs?t=2784.
In short they (probably) can but wont
Not defending here
But not many companies support a 6 year old product. From software side.
You don't see it phones
You don't see it TVs
You don't see it in motherboards
Not saying its right at work we have MANY 450/550s for cuda work
Personally im okay with that in most cases, my problem is when a company has promised something and then tries to make everyone forget that promise.. They should have kept their mouth shut from the beginning and since they didn't they should deliver on their promises.. goes for nvidia, amd or whatever company we could be talking about.
Look up![]()
did Nvidia they actually say it in writing? or are people going off tech site said this? so must be true?
did Nvidia they actually say it in writing? or are people going off tech site said this? so must be true?
Yeah, I'd be very surprised if these promises were all official.
NVIDIA will support the DX12 API on all the DX11-class GPUs it has shipped; these belong to the Fermi, Kepler and Maxwell architectural families.
Which NVIDIA GPUs will support DX12?
NVIDIA will support the DX12 API on all DX11-class GPUs it has shipped; these belong to the Fermi, Kepler and Maxwell architectural families. At launch, DirectX 12 is supported by all Maxwell and Kepler GPUs. Fermi will receive DX12 support later this year (expected around the first wave of DX12 content).
did Nvidia they actually say it in writing? or are people going off tech site said this? so must be true?
In addition, NVIDIA will match Microsoft OS support for DX12. Over 70% of gaming PCs are now DX11 based. NVIDIA will support the DX12 API on all the DX11-class GPUs it has shipped; these belong to the Fermi, Kepler and Maxwell architectural families.
i personally wouldnt, it killed my SSD, but most people are ok