Is the 0608 bios any good? as that is the one I'm using atm.
Seems OK to me. Some people say that 0401 was the best one. I've nevr noticed any difference with any of them
Is the 0608 bios any good? as that is the one I'm using atm.
Seems OK to me. Some people say that 0401 was the best one. I've nevr noticed any difference with any of them
Seems OK to me. Some people say that 0401 was the best one. I've nevr noticed any difference with any of them
Apparently changing the multiplyer dont work with that one.
Flashed from 0703 to 0401 using EZ Flash2 and went fine, didnt even need to reset the CMOS, just running Orthos and once thats ok for a couple of hours i'l stick it back to 3.4ghz.
If you need to get your FSB above 1500 then use 0608 or 0401
If you need 4x1gb and/or1333fsb support then use 0703.
I am using 0608 and I cant get above 1700fsb, is 0703 even worse?
If you need 4x1gb and/or1333fsb support then use 0703.
Ive been reading a few posts on the Asus forum and the 0703 Bios has cleared up many issues when running 4x1gig modules, maybe your brand was ok anyway.0608 works fine here with 4 x 1GB, apart from the memory hole between about 723 and 838. Can't run at 800 so I run at 711. Does 0703 solve that I wonder....
Ive been reading a few posts on the Asus forum and the 0703 Bios has cleared up many issues when running 4x1gig modules, maybe your brand was ok anyway.
Im going to see what FSB 0401 gives me and if its no better/worse than 0608 then nothing lost.
I take it your Ram wont run faster than 838.
You may have hit a memory hole as ive gone from the low 1700's to currently stressing at 1850. Try dropping your divider to 7 and have a go in the low 1700's.Im on 0608 and i cant boot at anything over 1600FSB even with the ram on a divider. Cant run it 1:1 as i have a mix of Geil 667 and 800
I'm confused, in Vista I can do 8 hours + stable at 3.4Ghz, 850Mhz ram, 1.47V, I can also do 3DM06 over again with no errors, but in XP, I crash in 3DM06 at 3.4Ghz, also on the desktop too, and with my 850/1020Mhz 2900XT overclock, that is fine in Vista, but unstable in XP :s.
Who'd have thought that, Vista more stable than XP![]()