Busted!CS||nuTs said:Screenshot from Anandtech
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Busted!CS||nuTs said:Screenshot from Anandtech
Big.Wayne said:Busted!
WJA96 said:So from the above post it clocks as well as an E6600, but with half the cache. So we can expect about a 16-17 sec SuperPi. Why would anyone buy anything else. I really don't understand Intel's marketing.
Big.Wayne said:Busted!
Same deliberation really.Lolcb said:- E4300/E6600
- 2GB Corsair Ram
- 8800GTS
- Asus P5W DH Deluxe
My fun rig, I'm just thinking if I should go with 6600 or 4300.
Up to a certain aise in fsb you can leave the vcore at default, like me E6300 only needs default on 2.8GHz, but after a certain point you will have to, like when i had my E6300 clocked at 3 i needed to raise the vcore to 1.4.paniK said:n00b question: when raising the FSB, do you have to alter the vcore in order for the chip to be stable. say you OC it from 1.8ghz to 2.6ghz. Would the vcore have to raised to stabilize it? and how do you determine the increments on the vcore?
If you've got good cooling you can just whack it up to your prefered max voltage, then increase the fsb until the chip or motherboard top out. Depends on your cooling, but 1.45, 1.5, 1.55? 1.6 if you're w3bbo on watercoolingpaniK said:thanks for the info. but what increments is it recommened to raise vcore by?
joeyjojo said:Also, mod please make the h in "THe" lower case