• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

***The Official E4300 Overclocking Thread***

easyrider said:
Reading reviews they have said" Overclocking that allows higher FSB due to fixed PCIE/ PCI Buses on the ASROCK 945G DVI.

We clocked the board to max of 299 FSB"

So going on this review 299 x 9 should be achievable 2.691 ghz

which will be fine for my needs.

Anandtech review Here

States that 300 FSB is a gimme with this mobo.

"This board is a decent overclocker for a budget board although we could not help but think the board would easily overclock better with additional memory and processor voltage options"

Right - they got roughly 30MHz over the base FSB. If you do that with an E4300 you'll get 230FSB which is 2.1GHz. I've used that board with P4 930's that were known to do 270FSB in an Abit AL-8, but wouldn't break 225FSB on that ASRock board. I hope I'm wrong though.
 
WJA96 said:
Right - they got roughly 30MHz over the base FSB. If you do that with an E4300 you'll get 230FSB which is 2.1GHz. I've used that board with P4 930's that were known to do 270FSB in an Abit AL-8, but wouldn't break 225FSB on that ASRock board. I hope I'm wrong though.


LOL you are right,

I never took into account the base FSB of the E4300 being only 800mhz :o

I just went with the multi,

oops :o

2.1ghz it is then.
 
Minstadave said:
Yup thats pretty good, what voltage did it need?

Just went in straight at 1.4. Is that a bit high? The temps are 32 idle / 55 during Orthos.

Memory is at 5-5-5-15 which is its normal rating I think. Should they be tightened? Doesn't make much difference to ddr2 does it?

Why would 3.2 give a lower score in 3d6 (6250) than 3.0 (6550)? Should I be getting more? I didn't do a full re-install, I just took the Nforce drivers off, swapped mobos and chips and installed the gigabyte ones - seems to have worked.
 
Alex R said:
Just went in straight at 1.4. Is that a bit high? The temps are 32 idle / 55 during Orthos.

Memory is at 5-5-5-15 which is its normal rating I think. Should they be tightened? Doesn't make much difference to ddr2 does it?

Why would 3.2 give a lower score in 3d6 (6250) than 3.0 (6550)? Should I be getting more? I didn't do a full re-install, I just took the Nforce drivers off, swapped mobos and chips and installed the gigabyte ones - seems to have worked.

1.4 is fine, and you may well get away with tightening your timing to 4-4-4-12 if you up Vdimm to 2.1 ish.
 
Minstadave said:
1.4 is fine, and you may well get away with tightening your timing to 4-4-4-12 if you up Vdimm to 2.1 ish.

Would that make any real difference? I read somewhere that tight timings really didn't have much impact on ddr2.
 
Minstadave said:
1.4 is fine, and you may well get away with tightening your timing to 4-4-4-12 if you up Vdimm to 2.1 ish.
I think it depends which RAM you are using (not sure about the TEAM) but the Crucial stuff I got is happily running 4-4-4-12 at 1.8vDimm.
Alex R said:
Would that make any real difference? I read somewhere that tight timings really didn't have much impact on ddr2.
hehe and I read somewhere that Elvis is alive ;)

Tighter memory settings are desirable so get tweaking!
 
Big.Wayne said:
e4300 (9x334)
Needs a motherboard happy running at 334MHz-FSB and memory capable of running at least PC2-5300 speeds (DDR667)

e6300 (7x429)
Needs a motherboard happy running at 429MHz-FSB and memory capable of running at least PC2-7200 speeds (DDR850) although any half decent PC2-6400 memory (DDR800) should be fine running the extra MHz.

Would the higher FSB on the e6300 give any performance advantage over the e4300?
 
Well i've reached 3.2GHz stable but the temps were very high, idling at 40-45 and hitting 65-70 on load, the thing kept restarting which isn't surprising.

So reseated the Scythe, shoved a more powerful 120mm fan on and im currently at 2.7GHz at stock voltage (1.2v) with idle temps of 33-36 and load temps of 46-49 with TAT which im much happier with.

Seems to be stable so far and the GeIL is holding out well at 4-4-4-10 so im just having a play at the moment to see whats best performance wise. I'm hoping I can hit 3GHz at stock voltage but I highly doubt it :(
 
Kaiju said:
Would the higher FSB on the e6300 give any performance advantage over the e4300?
In theory it should, in the real world well I guess it wouldn't be noticable outside of benchmarks. Given the choice I would probably prefere to run with the overclock that allowed the highest FSB (all other things being equal).

I've got an e6300 sitting here, if I get time I will take out this e4300 and do some tests, to be honest I have just been getting on with stuff using this system and a Core2 Duo running at 3GHz + is very nice, the small matter of the FSB running slower than say an overclocked e6300 doesn't seem of any concern, guess I will need to get some good DVD-recoding software installed and see how FSB effects that (could shave a few mins off maybe?).

The prospect of buying e4300's for £80 is quite appealing, wonder how these things perform under Vista?
 
Make your E4300 boot at 9x 266 effectively the same as a 6600

Perfect for Asrock mobos :D


attachment.php
 
Back
Top Bottom