Alex R said:...he touches wood)...
Keep it clean
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Alex R said:...he touches wood)...
Cairnsey said:Keep it clean
easyrider said:Reading reviews they have said" Overclocking that allows higher FSB due to fixed PCIE/ PCI Buses on the ASROCK 945G DVI.
We clocked the board to max of 299 FSB"
So going on this review 299 x 9 should be achievable 2.691 ghz
which will be fine for my needs.
Anandtech review Here
States that 300 FSB is a gimme with this mobo.
"This board is a decent overclocker for a budget board although we could not help but think the board would easily overclock better with additional memory and processor voltage options"
WJA96 said:Right - they got roughly 30MHz over the base FSB. If you do that with an E4300 you'll get 230FSB which is 2.1GHz. I've used that board with P4 930's that were known to do 270FSB in an Abit AL-8, but wouldn't break 225FSB on that ASRock board. I hope I'm wrong though.
easyrider said:2.1ghz it is then.
Minstadave said:Ouch thats a kick in the behind, 2.7 is much nicer
Minstadave said:Yup thats pretty good, what voltage did it need?
Alex R said:Just went in straight at 1.4. Is that a bit high? The temps are 32 idle / 55 during Orthos.
Memory is at 5-5-5-15 which is its normal rating I think. Should they be tightened? Doesn't make much difference to ddr2 does it?
Why would 3.2 give a lower score in 3d6 (6250) than 3.0 (6550)? Should I be getting more? I didn't do a full re-install, I just took the Nforce drivers off, swapped mobos and chips and installed the gigabyte ones - seems to have worked.
Minstadave said:1.4 is fine, and you may well get away with tightening your timing to 4-4-4-12 if you up Vdimm to 2.1 ish.
I think it depends which RAM you are using (not sure about the TEAM) but the Crucial stuff I got is happily running 4-4-4-12 at 1.8vDimm.Minstadave said:1.4 is fine, and you may well get away with tightening your timing to 4-4-4-12 if you up Vdimm to 2.1 ish.
hehe and I read somewhere that Elvis is aliveAlex R said:Would that make any real difference? I read somewhere that tight timings really didn't have much impact on ddr2.
I suggest you go make a nice little thread in the memory section and leave this one for e4300 overclocking results!Alex R said:So, what do you suggest?
Big.Wayne said:e4300 (9x334)
Needs a motherboard happy running at 334MHz-FSB and memory capable of running at least PC2-5300 speeds (DDR667)
e6300 (7x429)
Needs a motherboard happy running at 429MHz-FSB and memory capable of running at least PC2-7200 speeds (DDR850) although any half decent PC2-6400 memory (DDR800) should be fine running the extra MHz.
In theory it should, in the real world well I guess it wouldn't be noticable outside of benchmarks. Given the choice I would probably prefere to run with the overclock that allowed the highest FSB (all other things being equal).Kaiju said:Would the higher FSB on the e6300 give any performance advantage over the e4300?
mattpj said:how easy is this to do.....