Oh, that's the reason. Was about to moan. Actually more likely due to Foxconn closing.After today's earthquake in Japan (which is a distribution hub for Apple to Europe/NA), a lot of mac shipments have been delayed.
Mine changed from 21-22 March to 1-5 April now. Studio display is unchanged.
After today's earthquake in Japan (which is a distribution hub for Apple to Europe/NA), a lot of mac shipments have been delayed.
Mine changed from 21-22 March to 1-5 April now. Studio display is unchanged.
Oh, that's the reason. Was about to moan. Actually more likely due to Foxconn closing.
Oh, man. I would be devastated if mine was delayed. I was hoping to get everything up and running before my course starts on April 2nd.
Mine has shipped.
21st-22nd originally. Delayed to the 1st-5th April. Now shipped from China for the 28th.What was the delivery date before it was shipped? Was it always due on the 18th or was shipped quicker than expected?
Ultra seems a waste of money, nowhere near double the performance.
Just agree somewhat with the verge, the extra cash outweighs the extra performance. Unless someone really values it I guess.It seems reviews are all in agreement, this is good.
M1 Ultra is a beast, CPU in the 5950X range (usually beats it), GPU varies significantly depending on what you do (awful for gaming, very good for compute if they are Metal-enabled, otherwise you'll be disappointed).
Which benchmarks?
Just agree somewhat with the verge, the extra cash outweighs the extra performance. Unless someone really values it I guess.
I agree as well. Unless you need the extra GPU/media encoders/etc, and you specifically saturate 8 cores regularly in multithreaded workloads, there's no point. Most people will be fine with M1 Max (I ordered a Max too). Although Verge's tests were mostly single-threaded anyway.