From the rate this is going, it's just going to be a game where you fly little prop planes around to look at scenery and not the fully fledged game with civil air routes etc..
FSX is going to be better to be honest...
This is what it is, its a basic flightsim nothing more & MS have not claimed to be anything else.
You do get full working Radio Navigation VOR,DME,NDB,ILS on all the islands.
So it does have some again basic depth to it.
The problem is for some reason the hardcore FSX fans thought MS was making a new updated flight sim for them.
There misunderstanding now they are VERY VERY upset about this.
And some of the hardcore fans still don't get it, that MS Flight was never ment for them.
I would have thought when MS sold part of MS FSX to Prepar3d this would have let them know that MS was not going to be making a replacement for FSX. Why would Prepar3d buy it if it was about to be replaced.
If you want a basic flightsim without 100's of buttons to press to fly a plane then try MS Flight its a free download for the very basic planes.
If you want to press 100's of buttons then use FSX.
The only other thing about MS flight is it has room to grow into something more.
While with FSX you are stuck at the moment with 20-35 FPS
With Flight I get 50-60 FPS fully maxed @ 2560x1440.
With the kids comments are they going to want to learn about VOR,DME,NDB,ILS Navigation.
When this thread was started it was started with the op thinking it was going to be a FSX replacement. If you want that MS have got it covered & have handed that task over to Prepar3d.
So win win & happydays all round.
If you want a in depth very good flightsim but shame about the frame rates buy FSX or Prepar3 for $500
If you want a basic flight sim download MS Flight for free.