Not being rude, but I don't accept those figures are anything like accurate.
On £100k earnings, you'd pay £30k in income tax, and then NI on top of it.
As an investment banking headhunter of a decade I've a relatively decent grasp on what people get paid in that industry! Anyone at VP level or above would be on £70k basic at least on the clearing side (on the investment side you'd be looking at a £120k base at VP level - VP is roughly 7 yrs market experience), so quite a few will be below that £70k figure, but also the more senior lot will get paid more. Once you chuck bonuses into the mix, then the figures can get pretty big. On 2,000 staff that's a great deal of lost income tax and NI
Then add in the missed revenues from the clearing activity - whether MS would have paid these in the UK is another discussion. But any bank moving business across is a terrible thing. Two of the primary reasons so much US banking is based in London compared to other EMEA cities is the slightly more favourable time difference and the language skills - these obviously aren't the only reasons, but they're reasons nonetheless. Therefore, a move to Dublin doesn't really represent too much of an issue for them but a massive issue for us. It'll immediately start making Dublin more competitive and attractive compared to London, particularly given the UCITS fund laws in Ireland.
Edit - reports that this if false, which would be a wonderful thing.
Last edited: