-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
***The Official Q6600 Overclocking Thread ***
- Thread starter easyrider
- Start date
Indeed and that's the fun of it. Anyone can.
The more the merrier if you see where I'm coming from.
i still see no SS?
i cant link its a shop but here you go both in a super pi 1mb thread
I'm feeling chilly
That actually mad me snigger out loud!
love you P
i cant link its a shop but here you go both in a super pi 1mb thread
lol owned, easy your the noob if u cba trying that little bit higher for a 12 sec run
I'm feeling chilly
That actually mad me snigger out loud!
love you P
owned i think
nice contradiction of EVERYTHING you have said here
and i rest my case
goodnight
Last edited:
Ultimate FAIL
Easy, if you want stability shots that's fine but don't attack people with your views, if they want to test it how they want and use it like they do that's their own business and choice.
Personally I share the view on stability but I like benches and suicide runs as well.
Exactlly my opinion.
Why benchmark if you are not going to push things to the limits - we may aswell give up now and run our cpu's at stock if thats the case. Benchmarks only have to be stable enough to complete the test be it a PI run or 3dmark - it shows the components capabilities and the 'art' of overclocking to get it there. I'm all for benchmarks and pushing the envelope of processing power but I personally would not run a pc as my main rig 24/7 if it hadn't completed a full loop of prime - my choice - my rule - my opinion. I don't like the idea of data corruption as my pc has a lot of data I wouldn't want to lose and backing up 1tb of data can be a pita.
Benchmarking is about going for the max possible, takes skill and patience and is a hell of a lot more fun than running Prime all night. If folk wanna benchmark then I'm game for that, but I'll be sure to lower my clocks and hook my hd's back up once I've pushed for that extra millisecond in SuperPI
LOL
Failed overclock justification springs to mind.
I'm only interested in STABLE clocks
Not something I can do within of 5 mins of installing my mobo.
owned i think
nice contridiction of EVERYTHING you have said here
and i rest my case
goodnight
Did you actually say anything?
your boring, its not a failed clock if it completed the run
owned i think
nice contridiction of EVERYTHING you have said here
and i rest my case
goodnight
You ever thought of becomming a lawyer?
If this thread was called the q6600 stability thread then easyrider would have a point - it isn't so I'm afraid he dosn't.
You ever thought of becomming a lawyer?
If this thread was called the q6600 stability thread then easyrider would have a point - it isn't so I'm afraid he dosn't.
Fair point.
But
ITS EASY TO MAX A CHIP GETTING IT STABLE IS A WHOLE NEW BALL GAME
Here is MY stable 4ghz running superpi. Decent time I think.
Very nice..
My hat goes off to you
Can you 8hr prime it without error's?
No...its just as hard to max a chip hence your reluctance to back up your claims on the other forum.
Tweaking everything to get that final millisecond takes more skill than lowering an fsb or increasing vcore to get a cpu stable. Just my opinion.
LOL
after all raider Super PI is the dogs!
enough to make you want to "beat this soon" the funny thing is you never came back with a screenshot to "beat this soon"..
can you bench?
Last edited:
Feeling chilly again..lol
Tell me what I need to do?
Get 13s super PI?
Its been a while since..