Associate
- Joined
- 3 Dec 2006
- Posts
- 730
- Location
- Oxford
I was looking at the Fly Tampa website, they do some very good airports, very detailed. I still think Orbex is better though.
Talking about scenery, I bought the VFR airfields Vol 1, 2 ,3 and Gatwick Extreme(I worked out cheaper getting 4) I’m not that impressed to be honest. Gatwick Extreme is very good, happy with that but I thought the other airports will be a lot better. I don’t even see the gate/parking numbers on the tarmac?? Also in the configuration panel, I have selected all the options i.e. “install static aircraft” and for some reason I don’t have any aircraft at these airports and yes in my fsx options(aircraft) I have chosen aircraft too.
I’m around most of the week,
Mon – After 8.30
Tuesday – Yes
Wednesday – After 9
Thursday – most of the day, at home.
Friday – Yes
Weekend – as always, on and off!
I hope we can get some more people on Vatsim and come join myself , Blue and Chaders!
I find Fly-Tampa to overall make better airport scenery than Orbx - not really from a visual standpoint but because FlyTampa can actually make very high density scenery (like Hong Kong) with decent performance, something Orbx doesn't seem to bother doing. As for the UK2000 scenery, the VFR airfields aren't supposed to be extensively done scenery and it's not supposed to be anything like Gatwick Extreme. His extreme sceneries are properly done, the VFR airfields aren't anything special.