GD, so meme away.Don't forget this is SC, though you're right
GD, so meme away.Don't forget this is SC, though you're right
You mean...GD shirley?Don't forget this is SC, though you're right
Don't forget this is SC, though you're right
They initially announced it last August i believe but is that when they started development or have they been working on it longer?Tesla got to that stage in just a year...
You mean "If Tesla nails the software/training aspects for this thing they could progress further quite rapidly and they've got a good ML team so I'd not discount it."?I'm fairly certain the opposite is what was said.
Did you read the second paragraph of his post?
Irish Tom literally asks "what's the fuss", and dowie replies with why there's a fuss in dowie's view.
The argument was clearly "they haven't been working on it as long and look where they already are"
You mean "If Tesla nails the software/training aspects for this thing they could progress further quite rapidly and they've got a good ML team so I'd not discount it."?
So a company could "progress further rapidly" is a controversial thing to say now?
... sperging out ...
I mean that Musk showed some illustrations and talked about his vision for the robot, which struck me as, let's say, somewhat naïve. Based on the content of a six-minute long presentation, it seems as though Musk believes that someone (Tesla, suddenly?) should just go make an autonomous humanoid robot already—like, the technology exists, so why not do it?
To be fair, Musk did go out and do more or less much exactly that for electric cars and reusable rockets. But humanoid robots are much different, and much more complicated.
[...]
I feel like I have a pretty good handle on the current state of the art in humanoid robotics, and if you visit this site regularly, you probably do too. Companies like Boston Dynamics and Agility Robotics have been working on robots that can navigate through human environments for literally decades, and it's still a super hard problem. I don't know why Musk thinks that he can suddenly do better.
Tesla got to that stage in just a year, Boston Dynamics has taken a three decades to get to where they are mostly using control theory (they're not big on AI/ML AFAIK).
If Tesla nails the software/training aspects for this thing they could progress further quite rapidly and they've got a good ML team so I'd not discount it.
LolEh? Who said they were founded in 2021? They've been working on this robot for 1 year
You said Boston dynamics were working on their robot for decades, and based that on their founding date.
Tesla you say were working on their robot for 1 year, and based that not on their founding date, but their announcement date.
They have been working on that for much longer than one year. Still closer to coming to market than their truck though.I didn't think this needed to be explained but:
Boston Dynamics is a robotics company; they've been working on robots since they were founded.
Tesla is largely a car company, they've been working on this robot for one year.
They have been working on that for much longer than one year. Still closer to coming to market than their truck though.
Very simple minded of you.Tesla is largely a car company
Even more simple minded.they've been working on this robot for one year.
Tesla created a functional bi-pedal robot prototype in just one year and unveiled it at AI Day. The expected cost of Optimus is around $20,000 and could be on sale in as little as four years.
At AI Day #1, held in August 2021, Tesla CEO Elon Musk said that the company intends to start manufacturing robots. An actor dressed in a tight suit resembling a robot entered the stage and danced a funny dance, amusing the audience. This caused a wave of skepticism among those, who did not believe that Tesla would be able to present something usable in the coming years.
During Cyber Rodeo—the Giga Texas launch party held in April 2022—Musk said the Optimus prototype could be completed by the end of 2022, with the first version in production in 2023. These were very bold assumptions, receiving criticism from both laymen as well as specialists in the field. Obviously, Tesla is considered by many as a car company, so all other directions in which it develops (by leaps and bounds, by the way) are often simply not taken into account.
When Musk pushed back AI Day by one month to unveil the Optimus prototype, it was also met with skepticism and disbelief. However, a little over a year after it was first mentioned, Musk did indeed unveil a working prototype of a bi-pedal robot, surprising skeptics. Tesla has once again proved that it has great potential and is able to do what others consider impossible to do, at least in such a short time.
Very simple minded of you.
Even more simple minded.
You don't understand simple things it seems I've learnt a lot about you today and it explains why you have the views you end up with
What arr you barking on about. I presented no evidence, just that colonel did and then you brushed past it, so wanted you to present your side back. What dunk was there attempted. I didn't present the evidence that you were wrong. You understand how these things work. It really to you didn't it that you tried to brush past it and it wasn't allowed of you, after you've made the point and brought it up for post after post.Where is the lie? You're now making no sense at all, you've asked me about some mundane point multiple times, I've answered you and then you reply with that nonsense???
Did you understand my answer to your earlier question here too:
The ongoing Elon Twitter saga: "insert demographic" melts down
@dowie so was he or was he not on the board? From @Colonel_Klinck post, it seems you're wrong. Do you accept that is the case or have anything to show what you've said is correct regarding being a board member. As you've brought it up a few times when making a point, but when it's said your...forums.overclockers.co.uk
You seem to have gone remarkably quite about that one after your attempted dunk didn't work out.