The ongoing Elon Twitter saga: "insert demographic" melts down

Status
Not open for further replies.
I had to click on show ignored content to see what was being referred to, the comment that the activist factor -> a drop in advertising revenue is more damaging than the layoffs ought to be pretty apparent I literally provided links to what I was referencing in previous posts, I'm not sure why the potato guy/Apex is pretending he's missed anything re: the input of activists.

Though in case he or others have had a bit of amnesia, here is some of the input from activists, my comment is not based on "nothing"...





The context of the letter is that's what was sent to major brands before the digital advertising conference, it's been described as "educating" the brands by the CEO of one of the groups but the end result is they had a bunch of these prominent activist groups lobby them directly before the conference where they'd ordinarily pre-book ads and that resulted in them not doing so.
I saw a just stop oil activist this week and didn't buy petrol that day so must have been stop oil activists "educating" me and no other factors then.
 
I saw a just stop oil activist this week and didn't buy petrol that day so must have been stop oil activists "educating" me and no other factors then.

Who said there were no other factors?

The amount of denial here is pretty ridiculous, the CEO commenting on Twitter is well known for driving advertisers away from Fox, for example, some people trying to act like this campaign had no impact are being rather silly.

DM but still lol:


Was posted earlier... and according to one poster asking "dozens" to come back out of "thousands" somehow makes the claim that lost ad revenue is more of an issue than terminating staff seem "silly".
 
Last edited:
Who said there were no other factors?
You seemed to
The context of the letter is that's what was sent to major brands before the digital advertising conference, it's been described as "educating" the brands by the CEO of one of the groups but the end result is they had a bunch of these prominent activist groups lobby them directly before the conference where they'd ordinarily pre-book ads and that resulted in them not doing so.

My wife works in digital marketing and Ad spend is down across the board even for companies that don't have a CEO retweeting CTs and halving staff. I don't think whatever lobbying they did would have had a big impact here
 
You seemed to

I'm referring to the lobbying before that conference and the result, that the Elon factor may have dissuaded some doesn't negate that the lobbying quite clearly had an impact there.

My wife works in digital marketing and Ad spend is down across the board even for companies that don't have a CEO retweeting CTs and halving staff. I don't think whatever lobbying they did would have had a big impact here

This isn't just ad spending being down though... this is "basically sold almost nothing". Obviously, the CEO of the activist group is happy to brag about it (but he would, wouldn't he I guess), and it's pretty clear that it's rustled Elon's jimmies too.

It's quite bizarre why some are so keen to actively try and deny this, it was mentioned earlier though, apparently, this is viewed as giving an "excuse" to Elon because some blame or "fault" is perceived as being assigned to a third party and of course, the rabid anti-Elon types don't like that... everything must be 100% Elon.
 
Last edited:
I'm referring to the lobbying before that conference and the result, that the Elon factor may have dissuaded some doesn't negate that the lobbying quite clearly had an impact there.
Where's the evidence of impact, obviously the activists will play it up.

This article I found
"Angelo Carusone, the chief executive of the progressive nonprofit Media Matters for America, said on the call that he had worked on several efforts to use advertiser boycotts to pressure social media companies to clean up their platforms. Usually, he said, some of the advertisers he solicits will turn down his requests, saying that reaching potential customers is a higher priority than making a point to Silicon Valley.
So he admits here they often don't listen to him. So there must be something larger going on than just activists getting involved
But after the activist coalition reached out this week to Twitter’s top 20 advertisers, including Anheuser-Busch, Disney and Procter & Gamble, Mr. Carusone said all the companies he had been in contact with had said they were either considering a spending pause or were implementing one."

So my take from this is that when he contacted the companies they were already looking to pause or had already done so. It just seems so obvious that this would happen.
 
It's quite bizarre why some are so keen to actively try and deny this

Are you going to continue posting that you're upset about it until they post they agree totally.

Whatever attempts have been made to lobby the advertisers aren't crediting such things for their actions. They are instead very clearly stating they are unhappy with brand risk. If it took lobbyists to inform them of that then I'd be amazed.
 
Don't forget this is dowie's made up comment on the input of the activists. It's based on nothing, just in the fact it excuses Elon for his poor actions and provides an escape goat.

He can argue again for days anything since, but this was his initial comment.

Absolutely no proof. Never mentions the more damaging thing which is Elon.

A what now?
 
A what now?

An escape goat. It comes from 16th Century France when a specially trained goat was kept for Prince Louis (later King Louis XIV) so that he could make a rapid escape in the event of rebels reaching the palace. A goat was chosen because of their superior cliff climbing ability in the mistaken belief that peasants were too stupid to look up.

Surprised you don't know this, tbh.
 
The coming weeks topic to bully elon with is how it would be good to have some kind of verification system, maybe with an icon next to the user to indicate they are the real deal.
 
Explain why twitter users are incapable of evaluating legitimacy of people whose content they look at, is there no option to ignore/spoiler content of anyone I haven't blessed.

Seems like the implosion is now self-perpetuating, with the firing of moderators aren't quality standards dropping further ... black hole status soon.
 
Does anybody really care if twitter goes the way of the dinosaur. Also allegedly bird based.

Along the lines of you can lead a horse to water, you can't make it drink.

You can lead Elon to buy twitter....
 
Last edited:
An escape goat. It comes from 16th Century France when a specially trained goat was kept for Prince Louis (later King Louis XIV) so that he could make a rapid escape in the event of rebels reaching the palace. A goat was chosen because of their superior cliff climbing ability in the mistaken belief that peasants were too stupid to look up.

Surprised you don't know this, tbh.
No by standard's please
 
"Escape goat is an "eggcorn," a word or phrase that is a mishearing of another word or expression. Scapegoat is one word and has a specific meaning related to its Biblical origins. Escape goat seems to refer to a farm animal that's good at sneaking out of its pen, not someone who is blamed for the mistakes of others. "

 
"Escape goat is an "eggcorn," a word or phrase that is a mishearing of another word or expression. Scapegoat is one word and has a specific meaning related to its Biblical origins. Escape goat seems to refer to a farm animal that's good at sneaking out of its pen, not someone who is blamed for the mistakes of others. "

You are just being a dead horse now...
 
did elon ban the guy who lets the world know where his jet is? is the impersonator thing only for musks and celebs?


wasn't there already loads of parody accounts that don't specify it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom