The ongoing Elon Twitter saga: "insert demographic" melts down

Status
Not open for further replies.
Elon Musk will actually be wrong sometimes on issues and he'll be corrected, that's okay, you don't need to get angry everytime it happens

Edit: Oh my god guys, I just clicked on reddit and it didn't work :mad:

Who is angry :cry: I am merely pointing out what a massive douche your hero is. When someone sets themselves up as the saviour they fully deserve to be mocked. There isn't truth and Elon's truth. Its like Trump's "alternative facts" at this point.
 
Who is angry :cry: I am merely pointing out what a massive douche your hero is. When someone sets themselves up as the saviour they fully deserve to be mocked. There isn't truth and Elon's truth. Its like Trump's "alternative facts" at this point.

Nothing is presented as fact and it can be openly debated on Twitter, that's the whole point.
 
Yep it was having trouble. API, display pics and banners.

I think it's fixed now.

Yes.

It was the 'unintended' bit that got me. Because what could possibly go wrong when your people can't tell the difference between 'dev' and 'prod'...:D
 
Last edited:
Nothing is presented as fact and it can be openly debated on Twitter, that's the whole point.

THE source of truth. What do you think people think when the person claiming his platform is the source of truth posts supporting a story? You don't think its a problem that it isn't actually factual? He is the one that put that stupid standard on Twitter.
 
THE source of truth. What do you think people think when the person claiming his platform is the source of truth posts supporting a story? You don't think its a problem that it isn't actually factual? He is the one that put that stupid standard on Twitter.

I took him saying that new Twitter being the source of truth was fairly tongue in cheek and mostly a dig at main stream media having lost the trust of the majority of people. Any social media platform will represent almost every view by it's very nature, how ever the important part about Twitter is that you can disagree with things freely. CNN and Fox News will never say things that goes against their advertisers, Twitter is a more open platform and can in fact be the source of truth.
 
Twitter is a more open platform and can in fact be the source of truth.

Indeed, that's the beauty of it, of course with such an open platform there are plenty of fringe lunatics too but just look at things like covid - we had stuff like "masks don't work" and the mainstream media initially enforced that narrative whereas if you followed relevant experts on Twitter it should have been clear that masks did in fact work.

(In fact, it should have been common sense in general; lack of evidence != evidence of absence and also masks don't have some magical properties that render them useless outside of hospitals).

Just watching the BBC or CNN etc.. and using them as your source of truth is just setting yourself up for mostly mid-wit takes re: the accepted government positions on things.

Stopping flights was "racist" early on then suddenly a good idea.

Locking down was going to occur but not "too soon" it needed to be timed right (which meant delaying it) because of some input from behavioral scientists or some other nonsense... in reality total BS, they could and should have locked down early but if you're just nodding along to CNN and the BBC then that was the seemingly "sensible" position from "the science".

IIRC one poster on here was surprised that I'd bought a big sack of rice and other supplies pre-lockdown (and indeed had locked down well ahead of the official one)... why would dowie want such a big sack of rice if we just need two weeks to flatten the curve.... again Twitter provided clarity for those who could be bothered to look in the obvious places for good info while someone just consuming some filtered media got sudden changes in policy and confusion. I avoided covid until 2022 and only caught it after I'd been vaccinated and had made the choice to take more risks, plenty of people following the BBC and just robotically waiting for government advice will have gotten infected and indeed infected family members and without vaccines that was quite risky!

Anyway... it's amusing how we've gone from supposedly Twitter only having a couple of weeks left before permanently crashing last year to now people getting excited over a few bugs/glitches that subsequently get fixed within hours.
 
Masks don't work was the early WHO stance. Twitter like most media just shut down any discourse as misinformation. The actual opinions of world leading experts like Lab Leak Theory were made fake news because of who was repeating them not because of the merit of the arguments.

Covid would be the antithesis of the argument of Twitter as a free source of information for me. It does however give legs to plenty of political stories that otherwise might be missed. Personally I live without it, it seems to reinforce the worst trends of the modern world.
 
I took him saying that new Twitter being the source of truth was fairly tongue in cheek and mostly a dig at main stream media having lost the trust of the majority of people. Any social media platform will represent almost every view by it's very nature, how ever the important part about Twitter is that you can disagree with things freely. CNN and Fox News will never say things that goes against their advertisers, Twitter is a more open platform and can in fact be the source of truth.

Open? He said the algorithm would be open source..... he said the files used for Twitter Files would be released to the press..... there is nothing open about Elon's Twitter.

Why have they lost the trust of the people? A huge part of it was TPG telling everyone that everything was fake news and he was the only source of news that should be listened to.... wait a minute, I'm seeing a pattern here.

I don't think he's joking. I think he believes his own bull **** now, he's fallen for it, he's red pilled and if off the reservation. I see nothing from Elon on Twitter that makes him any better than Fox or CNN, in fact I think he spends zero time fact checking anything, its all about the clicks and the endorphine hit he gets now. At least it shows the stories that he does next to **** all at his companies is probably true, he spends his whole day on Twitter with the likes of Catturd. He does seem to have dropped Eliza Bleu like a bad smell though.
 
Masks don't work was the early WHO stance. Twitter like most media just shut down any discourse as misinformation. The actual opinions of world leading experts like Lab Leak Theory were made fake news because of who was repeating them not because of the merit of the arguments.

Covid would be the antithesis of the argument of Twitter as a free source of information for me. It does however give legs to plenty of political stories that otherwise might be missed. Personally I live without it, it seems to reinforce the worst trends of the modern world.

The people using Twitter aren't the problem (well some clearly are and lots have been unbanned) its the egomaniac in charge, no one person should be in charge of such a powerful tool/company and it shouldn't be allowed to be in private hands either.
 
The people using Twitter aren't the problem (well some clearly are and lots have been unbanned) its the egomaniac in charge, no one person should be in charge of such a powerful tool/company and it shouldn't be allowed to be in private hands either.

Honestly man China is a much better country for you
 
Honestly man China is a much better country for you
Private social media companies are fundamentally unsustainable as it's nature will inevitably be so restricted by governments that it cannot be profitable, it is also unsurprising the the main backer behind Musk is the freedom-loving Al-Sauds. I wonder how many critics of Riyadh's government have had their details handed over by Musk?
 
Last edited:
Honestly man China is a much better country for you

I don't think their government or any government should have any ownership or inside influence over a social media company like they do with TikTok either. If you can't see the problem with people like Elon and Zuckerberg dominating such powerful companies then you are just asking for the trouble we've already had/got. They should be far more heavily regulated, in Meta case broken up and be public companies. Yes I know Meta is public but Zuckerberg still has 54% of voting power which means what he says goes.

Maybe the EU will grow some balls and do what Congress has failed to do.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom