Just because its short, doesnt mean it sucks.
amount of hours played doesnt equate to a epic game.
quality over quantity and this was my fav game last year . Or at least one of them. Just shy behind rd2 which ironically again was a 25h-30h game too..
Last of us 2 is a masterpiece and again only 20-25h game
I've never said it sucks, I really enjoyed it. I just think it's criminally short for the type of game it was especially as an RPG. RD2? My game-time on that is currently 45 hours and I've not completed it, have lots of side missions to do and I've not even attempted the hunting etc.
Not all games need to be long, I'm not even against games with short campaigns like Call of Duty or other shooters.
I actually liked that it was a game that I completed fairly quickly and didn't need to devote tens/hundreds of hours to get to the end of but when I saw it was made by the makers of Fallout I just assumed it would be longer than it was. Probably my own mistake for not looking more into the game and realising what it was but from the time I did have with it, i really enjoyed it.
But it was too short that I can even think about buying the DLC for. And I didn't even pay for it.