The "Post your pictures here" thread.

Raymond Lin · 22 Jul 2013 at 19:57

Thanks, and i think i prefer this one now.

Genoma · 22 Jul 2013 at 21:12

I like the last one better, was more fun!

Raymond Lin · 23 Jul 2013 at 01:00

Genoma · 23 Jul 2013 at 17:42

cool montage but something weird going on in the last pic?

Raymond Lin · 23 Jul 2013 at 17:44

It's her other arm moving across.

Genoma · 23 Jul 2013 at 20:15

ah makes sense now!

Janesy B · 23 Jul 2013 at 20:25

Kid: U WANT SOME ICE CREAM M8, ACTUALLY I CHANGED MY MIND.

Skalaberg · 23 Jul 2013 at 20:50

jonneymendoza said:
IMG_0383.jpg by jonneymendoza, on Flickr

I hope this isn't a dumb question as I'm new to photography but I notice in the exif data for this pic it was taken at f2.8. The shot is beautifully sharp and all in focus along the length/height of the building. If I was to guess I'd have thought it was taken at at least f8 or higher. How come everything is in focus like that at f2.8?

Did you use spot focus and where was the focus point if so?... I'm genuinely intrigued.

Janesy B · 23 Jul 2013 at 21:02

It was taken fairly wide and the subject is far away from the lens so more of the image will be in focus.

Skalaberg · 25 Jul 2013 at 00:14

Been trying a while now to get a decent shot of the moon. Had another go tonight using a tripod but its a cheap nasty one I was given ages ago. couldn't quite seen to get it sharp using the 5s timer and I think it might be the flimsy tripod. Any recommendations for a more sturdy tripod that doesn't cost the earth?

_DSC0022 by skalaberg, on Flickr

edit: For this shot I used f10 @ 1/15 sec. Maybe I would have been better off using maybe f7 and going for a faster shutter speed?

Raymond Lin · 25 Jul 2013 at 01:44

jonneymendoza · 25 Jul 2013 at 07:05

Skalaberg said:
I hope this isn't a dumb question as I'm new to photography but I notice in the exif data for this pic it was taken at f2.8. The shot is beautifully sharp and all in focus along the length/height of the building. If I was to guess I'd have thought it was taken at at least f8 or higher. How come everything is in focus like that at f2.8?

Did you use spot focus and where was the focus point if so?... I'm genuinely intrigued.

It was shot wide and at a distance so more is in focus

some new pics below, hope you enjoy. these are from my 100 strangers project

Stranger 41-100.jpg by jonneymendoza, on Flickr

527A5079.jpg by jonneymendoza, on Flickr

portrait 35 by jonneymendoza, on Flickr

Stranger 48-100.jpg by jonneymendoza, on Flickr

{SAS}TB · 26 Jul 2013 at 20:08

Sigma 10 - 20mm Test by Jon°, on Flickr

-|ScottFree|- · 26 Jul 2013 at 20:59

Raymond Lin said:

Nice capture...

Janesy B · 26 Jul 2013 at 22:31

A departure from all the car/motorsport photography I do...

IMG_0917 by Bryan Janes, on Flickr

IMG_0918 by Bryan Janes, on Flickr

IMG_0933 by Bryan Janes, on Flickr

IMG_0934 by Bryan Janes, on Flickr

IMG_0957 by Bryan Janes, on Flickr

D.P. · 26 Jul 2013 at 22:32

2StepSteve · 27 Jul 2013 at 02:34

Greenwich by SteveRix, on Flickr

ElDude · 27 Jul 2013 at 07:32

Raymond Lin said:
Thanks, and i think i prefer this one now.

The eldest girl in this reminds me of an actress and its been driving me nuts which one since you posted this!

Have you tried any b&w conversions for this set (if you took more). I find photos of kids in set ups like this look nice in b&w. We've got a b&w photo of my mum and aunts from about 50 years ago in a setting like this and it's really nice.

Also, and I know this is probably impossible, that bench has an "in memory of..." Sign. Getting individual photos of the kids sitting so it says that with just them next to it would be a nice touch.

realscot · 27 Jul 2013 at 18:13

ElDude said:
The eldest girl in this reminds me of an actress and its been driving me nuts which one since you posted this!

Anna Kendrick maybe?

Vertigo · 27 Jul 2013 at 21:08