• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

The RT Related Games, Benchmarks, Software, Etc Thread.

Caporegime
Joined
4 Jun 2009
Posts
31,153
Hmmmm

Remember the claims of rDNA 3 RT.... :cry: As per usual, take with a huge truck load of salt. Hopefully they do though as it's clear what direction the gaming industry is heading so they would be very foolish not to act now.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TNA
Soldato
Joined
9 Nov 2009
Posts
24,877
Location
Planet Earth
Remember the claims of rDNA 3 RT.... :cry: As per usual, take with a huge truck load of salt. Hopefully they do though as it's clear what direction the gaming industry is heading so they would be very foolish not to act now.

Maybe for once they can release before Nvidia, instead of waiting six months after them and price them OK from launch. Probably unlikely.
 
Last edited:
Caporegime
Joined
4 Jun 2009
Posts
31,153
UE making good use of RTX hardware, you love to see it :cool:

We are making a lot of improvements in UE's rendering pipeline by taking advantages of RTX hardware. It happens on UE NvRTX branchhttps://developer.nvidia.com/game-engines/unreal-engine/rtx-branchHere is the latest ReSTIR GI implementation that we've done in UE5, which lights the scene with only emissive materials



 
Caporegime
Joined
4 Jun 2009
Posts
31,153
Ray reconstruction and ReSTIR GI are my 2 fav technologies having seen how it transforms Cyberpunk from a noisy path/ray traced image to a super clean and almost CGI-looking image. It's brilliant.

Yes ray reconstruction is fantastic! But sadly in very few games, hopefully will improve going forward which given nvidias other tech, I suspect it will.
 
Soldato
Joined
29 Aug 2010
Posts
7,872
Location
Cornwall
Caporegime
Joined
4 Jun 2009
Posts
31,153
Why would AMD put time and effort into improving RT performance when their customers are constantly telling us how much they dislike RT? :D
iTHyUnr.gif


Funny because it's true! :D

I suspect if rdna 4 turns out to be very good for RT, a lot of peoples tune on here will change @TNA you got the bookmarks of certain posts at the ready? A new poll may have to be created at some point..... :D :p :cry:

It's funny even just reading some of the posts on amds sub reddit!

Again, such a relevant and accurate article, should really be pinned tbh :p








In other news:

 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
14 Aug 2009
Posts
2,827
Why would AMD put time and effort into improving RT performance when their customers are constantly telling us how much they dislike RT? :D
True that, they should be putting the effort in order to have at least 32 or 64GB vRAM cards, that surely will matter in the future! I'm sure a diversity in the rocks and blades of grass will be appreciated! :)

Joke aside, of course AMD will have "brand new" RT stuff in it, question is... will it match 4xxx series or will actually compete with 5xxx series? Will they make FSR an equivalent to DLSS or the RT+DLSS and other features will make nVIDIA a winner again? AMD, right now, has to win on a lot of fronts in order to get back users to a significant degree. Each time they chose to lay back and care less, is a new front nVIDIA will open for them.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom