Soldato
I don't think the hate is really around the performance, I think it's more about the power efficiency (which other than temps, doesn't bother me that much), the current pricing and the fact you could get this same level of performance ~16 months ago. I think there'd be an equal amount of 'hate' if in 16 months Nvidia's top-end card performed at Vega 64 levels, cost more and ran hotter.Cancel original question.
So, I've settled on a clock now, done my benches higher to test stability and now dialled back down to 1650/1050 for 24/7 gaming. Just been playing Ghost Recon Wildlands mix of Very high and Ultra with SMAA, got a 72fps cap on and game is sticking to that cap like glue. Maybe the odd occasion it drop to 60fps but man its so damn good and smooth.
I think this card is bloody brilliant in all honesty, no idea what all the hate is for.
To a degree I think it's as much disappointment as it is hate. Lots of people wanted to upgrade their 290X/390X/Fury cards but AMD didn't release anything, so the people ended up getting a 1080 with the hope that AMD would eventually deliver something better that they could switch to, but they're finding it hard to justify the cost of switching for so little gain. This is sort of the situation I was in because I own a Fresync monitor I'm happy with. I still hope to get a Vega 64 at some point though.
Last edited: