2.1 is the newest version and is ment to work in any game that supposts that DLSS version. I think DLSS 2 is the last version that requires training in every new game that uses it. DLSS 1.9 was not tensor based.
DLSS 2.0
Last edited:
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
The thread which sometimes talks about RDNA2
- Thread starter CAT-THE-FIFTH
- Start date
- Status
2.1 is the newest version and is ment to work in any game that supposts that DLSS version. I think DLSS 2 is the last version that requires training in every new game that uses it. DLSS 1.9 was not tensor based.
DLSS 2.0
ask Moore's law is dead, he can tell you
"The 3090 is so big that for the first time you can play games at 60fps in 8k." Jensen
Reality: Lol @ 0fps at 04:44
Where are the 60 fps? How can you get them? Scaling from 720p to fake 8k maybe?
It has 60fps sometimes in the menus to be fair. Jensen was right.
Reality: Lol @ 0fps at 04:44
Where are the 60 fps? How can you get them? Scaling from 720p to fake 8k maybe?
It has 60fps sometimes in the menus to be fair. Jensen was right.
2.1 and its still game specific
I think your mixing up cores/cu's with texture throughput ect, from what your saying the 6800XT with 4608 "shader units" would only be 53% as fast as the 3080 with its 8704 "shader units" at 4k / 8k but that is not the case. Shader count != rendering throughput
And AMD have shown that you don't need raw memory bandwidth to compete, before a 256bit would never had work for a high end 4k capable card .... but here we are.
2.1 and its still game specific
I think your mixing up cores/cu's with texture throughput ect, from what your saying the 6800XT with 4608 "shader units" would only be 53% as fast as the 3080 with its 8704 "shader units" at 4k / 8k but that is not the case. Shader count != rendering throughput
And AMD have shown that you don't need raw memory bandwidth to compete, before a 256bit would never had work for a high end 4k capable card .... but here we are.
Basically no card can do 8k in a game like Control without a feature like DLSS. Native a 3090 does some like 9fps native at 8k. With DLSS you can get 50fps. Most new AAA games like cyberpunk wont do 8k without DLSS on any nvidia card.
Its not that modern gpu lack performance at 8k, its that they massively lack the performacne at 8k in the latest AAA games.
Some game will run well at 8k like Doom eternal
0:00 - Doom Eternal
1:38 - Horizon Zero Dawn
3:17 - Star Wars Squadrons
4:54 - Death Stranding
6:28 - Forza Horizon 4
7:45 -Gears 5
9:23 - Resident Evil 3
10:22 - F1 2020
12:16 - Shadow of The Tomb Raider
13:52 - The Witcher 3 | Stock iGPU
Note how much better the performance the 3090 has vs the 6800xt. Many of these games hit 60fps or above. Note Shadow of The Tomb Raider, Gear 5, Resident Evil 3 and F1 2020 etc does not. Forza Horizon 4, Doom 2016, Doom eternal, Star Wars Squadrons will hit a playable 60fps.
Last edited:
In Control a 3090 can get 9fps native 8k, its in the video about control i just posted.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 31,179
Right, so follow this thought. The inability is not to do with the comparison of shader numbers or memory bandwidth between the 6000 series and the 3000 series like you were going on about. That is irrelevant. It's to do with the fact that one series (currently) can render natively at a much lower resolution and upscale it more efficiently.
It's a reverse VSR.
Flame away no one cares.Dogs work more like
More shaders and memory performance is better (everything else as well) but no card can run native 8k and get 60fps in every game. That the standand for PC gaming x resolution at 60fps locked. Only with DLSS do you have any type of hope for getting close to 8k (1440p native) @ 60fps in a really graphic heavy game like Control.
DLSS will kill off native rendering in future.
You don't even know what that word mean. I don't need you to post the dictionary definition that you found after a 5 second search.
The rest of your post is irrelevant to what i said. I really hope you get paid for all your shilling.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 31,179
Accuses others of cherrypicking. Calls other people ignorant. Talks about nailing people who are misleading.
Believes that you can compare shader counts across different architects.
Quoted for truth.
Haha and you were talking about cherry picked games? So from 10 only 3 will reach 60 fps Doom eternal is more like 50 and the fps is all over the place some times in the 30s.
I didn't wanted to talk about the 8k performance but you and Grim5 were bragging about how great the 3090 is doing in 8k.
Well you don`t need the 6800xt for that. The 3090 is dead already at 8k. Remember 0 fps at native 8k with rt on.
It's not that long ago we used to render games at higher res that our monitors supported.
Now here we are where the future is glorified upscaling.
L
Lol a true fanboi. Sticks his head in the sand when reality bites. The video is not fake and clearly shows a 6800XT running games at 8K with the clockspeeds and VRAM usage. The 3080 would choke to death judging by how the VRAM is exceeding 13GB in most cases. And before you again say 3090, remember that the 6800XT is cheaper than the 3080 yet is keeping up with the 3090.
Yet the 6800xt has half the shaders and less memory bandwidth than a 3080 yet competes with it at resolutions actually used, the comparisons you are trying do not relate to real performance and cannot be compared 1 to 1. This is why people are mocking you.
4k gaming is below single figures in the marketplace, 8k basically doesn't exist in the marketplace. No-one but the exceptionally deluded are buying any current generation card for 8k gaming, dlss or not. And reaching for this justification to justify a current gen purchase of *any* card is properly, transparently grasping at straws. Which is why people are laughing.
and 60fps for a highly paced shooter is not a desired standard. Most i think would argue for faster fps over higher resolution.
Last edited:
A slight correction for you. FidelityFX Super Resolution will kill off DLSS.
News at 10 : Faster cards are faster, current GPU's cant game at 8k native
Do you have nvidia stock or something ? unless nvidia opens up that solution for other to adopt (consoles ect) OR make the implementation game engine agnostic that will just never happen. Just look at gsync ect.
A DLSS type technology that isn't HW specific may help out but really no one will be looking at 8K rendering for a very VERY long time so for now that (and RT) are small fries in comparison to native rasterization performance. I mean the 1440p / 4k user base is still in the single percentage points
From steam survey (main display resolution) :
1080p : 65%
1440p : 7%
4k : 2%
Other (including 8k) : 2.11%
- Status