I completely agree, although it's still nice to watch some of the 'big trilogies' again in HD it wouldn't warrant me buying a standalone player for this purpose so having it built into a console is a bonus imo as now I can have my cake and eat it - albeit at a premium cost.dannyjo22 said:Until your post I never really considered that in fact neither format could win. Film on demand via downloading would suit my puposes best of all, rather than storing a disc to be watched once every 5 years on a whim.
When you look through your collection at some of the stuff you bought to watch once or twice it just doesnt make financial sense. I doubt other than the big trilogies few of my collection has been in the dvd player more than twice. And how often do you sit and watch a film thats on terrestrial tv or sky even though its in your collection. I even sit there putting up with adverts when I could have just put the disc in the player![]()
I pretty sure there will be a winner from the two new formats over DVD as it seems the big film companies etc are pushing pretty hard to get the technology into peoples homes.
Maybe pushing HD is a way of trying to keep technology moving to combat piracy? A lot of people download movies illegally in DiVX format at around 700MB which they could probably get within a few hours. If you are going HD on the other hand then it's going to make it less accesable except for the hardcore newsgroup users.
I don't think downloading content will be the clear winner this time round. Maybe it will take over form BD or HD-DVD, but as it stands there are still more people with dial up than broadband in the Uk and a hell of a lot of them will have standard speed connections.
Last edited:
), not a single sales figure.
)