** THERMAL GRIZZLY - CHAMPIONSHIP THERMAL PASTE **

A member of staff may review, but I am organising to send out to reviewers to see what they think of it and also I may look into sending some to some forum members to test it out. We'll see. :)


My loop agrees with forumers doing some testing :D
 
Is this worth the extra £2 over the gelid?
I'll be using it in my new watercooling build 4770(xspc raystorm), will it be ok to use on the gpu waterblock as well?
 
It is better than IC Diamond 24 tho? :p

It's not compatible. Thermal Grizzly is much easier to apply.

It doesn't mark the IHS. In terms of temperature differences, there will be enough independent reviews available soon for the performance aspect to be answered.

In our testing, yes it is.
But as we aren't an independent review site, feel free to wait for independent opinion before deciding for yourself.
 
Well , as i test i just applied some Kryo to my living room pc which is a 8350 @ 4.6ghz with a h100i cooler. Overall it knocked off 2/3 degrees over IC diamond.

However, i wouldn't say its particularly nice to apply, you cant just put a blob on the die and spread it out, it will just stick to the spreader tip.

As above you need to apply the Kryo in lines which results in a rather thick layer rather than a tidy thin layer of paste.

I think the problem is that the (i assume) solvent agent in the paste quickly evaporates and the paste becomes very sticky very fast and becomes impossible to spread, hence why you have to apply it in lines. But it ends up pretty wasteful.

Personally i wouldn't recommend it over the likes of Mx4 which imho is probably the best overall past out there for any application (can't speak for Ln2).

However it would be interesting to compare the application of the other two variants.
 
Last edited:
Well , as i test i just applied some Kryo to my living room pc which is a 8350 @ 4.6ghz with a h100i cooler. Overall it knocked off 2/3 degrees over IC diamond.

However, i wouldn't say its particularly nice to apply, you cant just put a blob on the die and spread it out, it will just stick to the spreader tip.

As above you need to apply the Kryo in lines which results in a rather thick layer rather than a tidy thin layer of paste.

I think the problem is that the (i assume) solvent agent in the paste quickly evaporates and the paste becomes very sticky very fast and becomes impossible to spread, hence why you have to apply it in lines. But it ends up pretty wasteful.

Personally i wouldn't recommend it over the likes of Mx4 which imho is probably the best overall past out there for any application (can't speak for Ln2).

However it would be interesting to compare the application of the other two variants.

Hence my quote above in my mini test - I found it worked best if you put a bit less on the tip of the spreader and then just complete a line in one go - otherwise as you say it gets a bit sticky and you end up pulling up what you have already applied. Still think overall it is worth it - just need to spend a bit more time and effort in applying it.YMMV.

Mark
 
Is spreading the appropriate application method for this paste? When I contacted Gelid to ask their advice on application they told me to use the pea method despite providing a spreading tool with the paste.
 
Is spreading the appropriate application method for this paste? When I contacted Gelid to ask their advice on application they told me to use the pea method despite providing a spreading tool with the paste.

This stuff is different apparently - spreading is the preferred method of application. That is why they give you two screw on spreading tips in the pack.
Works out ok - see my earlier posts for more info.

Mark
 
From looking at der8auer spreading the paste in the video above, it doesn't look too hard to apply. I guess if you apply it differently it is harder maybe. But I would go with what is recommended in the video above.
 
Back
Top Bottom