Man of Honour
- Joined
- 5 Jun 2003
- Posts
- 91,548
- Location
- Falling...
Yes whilst digital notes are good I have yet to find anything that Beats a pen and paper for doing notes and capturing thoughts.
Annual review done - €8500 salary uplift finalised from my discussion with the boss the other week, which I'm happy with, and some other small performance related incentives to go along with it, which was just an idea at the time but has now been fleshed out a bit more.
My MD knows I could earn more elsewhere, and can't quite compete with those salaries - but from my side I am afforded many intangible benefits here that I would be very unlikely to get elsewhere, so I think it's a fair arrangement we have.
For any hiring managers; have you experienced a drop in commitment from candidates? Just recently we've had a run of candidates either accept positions and then ghost us, receive contracts and not sign them, or accept positions and then U turn shortly afterwards for a better offer.
I must stress that these are all remote IT positions in a very competitive niche industry, but it just seems people are less invested in committing to things at the moment.
You are a pre-sales software person. You do not speak loyalty, you speak dollars. Go to pre-IPO company and prosper.Tried to write out a post with the details of my dilemma and it became a bit of a monster.
To try a and summarise, currently tech pre sales for large vendor. I Like my role and products I work with (a market leader), package is very good, but there are issues on the counter part sales team side which are having a knock on effect to earnings.
Small specialist vendor with competitive product offered me a role, same base, but you’d hope a sales team that’s running ok as this is all they do.
Benefits better at current big co, but the smaller place is pre ipo (2-3 year expectation).
I’m torn as is genuinely really like where I am now, excellent money and work life balance, just some of the things outside of my immediate team which impact me are not good and aren’t going to be getting better for a while.
Just had 2 weeks off, first day back today - my god, can't believe I have 1 month left to go, it just sucks lol.
I'm being micromanaged, nagged and harassed to hell and it's really winding me up, I absolutely hate it.
Anyone else here ever been micromanaged? It's enough to drive you ****** nuts!
If you only have 1 month just tell them to **** ***. Micro management is horrible.
I was micromanaged a bit when I first moved into a consultancy role which was frustrating but thankfully the manager was also a very competent individual who I have a lot of time for. He also mentored me a bit and looking back some of the things that felt unnecessary and annoying were just improving my craft. An example would be he was quite fussy about the documentation I would produce, multiple iterations of feedback etc. I regard[ed] myself as pretty good at documentation and it felt I was being asked to dumb stuff down at times, being super explicit about things I considered obvious. Like I'd add in a caveat (made up example "It should be noted that in some cases data attribute X is not populated") and he'd pick up on it and want it spelled out why that caveat mattered (what the implications of X not being there might be). There were times when I would say **** it I'll just remove that section I've added in as a bonus then if you're just going to be awkward about it! In hindsight he was just guiding me to make things as transparent and easy as possible for people, assume the reader is less intelligent and less familiar with the subject matter, a busy person for whom this document is a very minor part of their day.Anyone else here ever been micromanaged?
I was micromanaged a bit when I first moved into a consultancy role which was frustrating but thankfully the manager was also a very competent individual who I have a lot of time for. He also mentored me a bit and looking back some of the things that felt unnecessary and annoying were just improving my craft
I was micromanaged a bit when I first moved into a consultancy role which was frustrating but thankfully the manager was also a very competent individual who I have a lot of time for. He also mentored me a bit and looking back some of the things that felt unnecessary and annoying were just improving my craft. An example would be he was quite fussy about the documentation I would produce, multiple iterations of feedback etc. I regard[ed] myself as pretty good at documentation and it felt I was being asked to dumb stuff down at times, being super explicit about things I considered obvious. Like I'd add in a caveat (made up example "It should be noted that in some cases data attribute X is not populated") and he'd pick up on it and want it spelled out why that caveat mattered (what the implications of X not being there might be). There were times when I would say **** it I'll just remove that section I've added in as a bonus then if you're just going to be awkward about it! In hindsight he was just guiding me to make things as transparent and easy as possible for people, assume the reader is less intelligent and less familiar with the subject matter, a busy person for whom this document is a very minor part of their day.
The stuff I didn't like so much was especially in the early days he also wanted to see mini-plans for small pieces of work. I found this frustrating, I'd be like I just want to get on and deliver it, I don't want to write out a plan for something that will be done in a week. Part of this I think was just trying to get confidence that I would be approaching things the right way as I was new to the job, but it was pretty alien to me. I'd never had to really explain how I was going to do something before I did it before.
I also had the shoe on the other foot at one point where I had someone reporting to me, both of us fairly new in the role who provided feedback that I was micromanaging them. I felt this was a bit unfair, I was playing devil's advocate a bit and highlighting potential pitfalls in her approaches but also being pretty supportive and giving her enough free rein to run things her way rather than dictating. What this taught me was that micromanagement is partly about perception, even when I felt I was deliberately avoiding micromanagement, she still felt micromanaged based on me providing feedback or views on what had/hadn't worked well in the past. I'm not sure what the takeaway from that should be, part of me tongue in cheek thinks if optional guidance is considered micromanaging then I might as well have just gone all in and micromanaged to have things done the way I thought best. It was just strange though, like feedback I totally wasn't expecting because I felt I'd been actively avoiding micromanagement.
I would stay and see what happens. Also check the market to see what VMware skills are needed.It looks as if Broadcom are going to acquire VMware (who I work for). This makes me sad. They have a history of culling staff and are entirely driven by profit, seemingly at the expense of the employees. They're also renowned for making things notoriously difficult for their customers. Maybe with the size of the acquisition and the fact that Broadcom software is rebranding as VMware may make this one different, but I'm not sure.
I've got some difficult decisions to make rather unexpectedly.
Stay and risk being culled, or reap the divident/share rewards if I keep my job. Maybe the culture won't change, no one really knows.
Or stay and jump ship as we learn more, but that might be at a time lots of VMware talent are also jumping ship.
Or leave early, as in, within the next few months.
You'd think with LinkedIn 'Easy Apply' it would be easy for companies to respond.