Did anybody spot Dr. Curry in the courthouse today. Smokin' hot. She was taking notes when Dr misandrist was rubbishing her findings apparently, getting ready for that recall.
I've no idea who that is.
Poll: This Johnny Depp Stuff
- Thread starter Dirk Diggler
- Start date
I've no idea who that is.
The one on left or right, both? The left is AH doctor person talking rubbish, the one on the right is an expert witness doctor that JD team hired and destroyed the PTSD side days ago whilst being smart and destroying the lawyer many times over, especially about her muffins.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 25 Oct 2004
- Posts
- 9,078
You have 2 opposing reports from 2 qualified psychologists, one of them is telling lies. Only one of them provided evidence, the other did not.
Dr S Curry came across as professional, accurate and too the point, Dr D Hughes did not, she came across as overly dramatic and did not provide evidence to back up her claims.
Dr S Curry came across as professional, accurate and too the point, Dr D Hughes did not, she came across as overly dramatic and did not provide evidence to back up her claims.
Zack Snyder Army of the Dead and Chris D'Elia's recast happened when that kicked off. No reason they can't do that here tbh.
Also not the first time either
Army Of The Dead: How Zack Snyder Completely Changed This Character
The journey to get to the release of Zack Snyder’s Army Of The Dead has been quite the adventure, with the project itself being a zombie that has been killed...www.youtube.com
Fair enough. Would love to see that happen!
Article being about JD is easy to demonstrate, I wouldn't think AH herself would object to that. It's everything else that's difficult, i.e. showing how a specific false claim in the Op-Ed resulted in financial losses for JD. Generally agree this is very difficult as there have never been a defamation award of this size in US history (this is also true of AH's coutercase against JD which she won't win). Doesn't mean he couldn't win a smaller amount, of course, but that shows the tall order of the task in front of JD.
Soldato
- Joined
- 17 Aug 2003
- Posts
- 20,160
- Location
- Woburn Sand Dunes
That's literally why they're in court .........
They're in court due to believing they are due damages against each other.
Soldato
- Joined
- 17 Aug 2003
- Posts
- 20,160
- Location
- Woburn Sand Dunes
No, they are not. Depp sued Heard because of the article. Heard counter sued for 'reasons'. Why do you think Depp is the plaintiff and Heard is the defendant?
JD is suing $50m for damages which he believed are caused by AH's false claims in the article. He's not suing for "she wrote a mean article". The court decides whether to award that damage.
Soldato
- Joined
- 17 Aug 2003
- Posts
- 20,160
- Location
- Woburn Sand Dunes
That's what i just told you.
Is there a difference?
Who said anything about what the court decides?
Seriously, the info is all out there. You could just google it instead of arguing.That's what i just told you.
Is there a difference?
Who said anything about what the court decides?
So we're in agreement, not sure why you keep disagreeing
Soldato
- Joined
- 17 Aug 2003
- Posts
- 20,160
- Location
- Woburn Sand Dunes
I'm disagreeing because you keep getting it wrong.
No, you just give me back what I said earlier as if it's a new point against what I'm saying. Either way, moving on.
Soldato
- Joined
- 17 Aug 2003
- Posts
- 20,160
- Location
- Woburn Sand Dunes
You didnt even know why they were in court, give over.
james.miller said:
You couldn't have known why otherwise you'd already know what AH's claims were. You also suggested that JD claimed the TRO causes the loss of earnings (he didnt), that he knew it was unwinnable (he didn't, because it isn't) AND that AH wouldn't deny the article was about him ?!! have you not watched any of the footage? at all? And i'm just telling you back what you've already said ? really HACO?
Last edited:
No you didn't when you don't know the difference between suing over mean articles and suing for damages. However, I'll let you have the final word after this as I know it's important for the likes of you in forums.
Soldato
- Joined
- 17 Aug 2003
- Posts
- 20,160
- Location
- Woburn Sand Dunes
You dont know what you're talking about HACO. I dont know why you continue with this, but resorting to personal insults says more about you than it does me buddy.
Maybe you should drop JD an email and tell him he doesnt know the difference then
(psst: He's suing because she's ruined his reputation, the amount is the compensation for having done so)
Permabanned
- Joined
- 25 Oct 2004
- Posts
- 9,078
No but she was also being sued by a movie studio for breach of contract for $10m for not getting them out, even though it was in the contract she signed. In her defense she said JD prevented her from doing nude scenes, yet the film was shot in 2013, shortly after they started dating, a year before their engagement and 2 years before they married. If JD was as controlling as she said way back then, why on earth did she get engaged and then marry him.
Last edited:
Permabanned
- Joined
- 25 Oct 2004
- Posts
- 9,078
It's about to kick off, grab the popcorn.
Boom right in there with the gendered language.
Boom right in there with the gendered language.
Last edited: