Imagine taking shots at Heard when youre coming out with that nonsense.
Poll: This Johnny Depp Stuff
- Thread starter Dirk Diggler
- Start date
Imagine taking shots at Heard when youre coming out with that nonsense.
To be fair Camille is pretty on top of her to stop her spouting BS when AH tries to go off-road. At this point I'm guessing JD team are giving her all the rope she needs to hang herself because all the not answering the question or completely avoiding it is making AH look bad
Soldato
- Joined
- 26 Dec 2009
- Posts
- 9,691
- Location
- North
Seems like she was desperately trying to stop him going off on his own where he then uses drugs and comes back even worse.
Which of course doesnt mean that it wasnt edited, just that she didnt do it"I've never edited a photograph"
Associate
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2006
- Posts
- 1,224
well if her acting career is now down the drain she has a great chance of being one of those statue mimes you see in city centers
When you're getting paid millions, I think that all goes out the window for many.
Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2005
- Posts
- 3,278
- Location
- The South
Caporegime
- Joined
- 11 Mar 2005
- Posts
- 32,221
- Location
- Leafy Cheshire
Oh my, three officers wrong?
"I've never edited a photograph"
She's never had blonde hair either.
German scat movies might find her bed dumping routine appealing.
Doesn't AH get tired of turning her head around every few seconds to face the jury to answer the question?
If I was sitting there in the jury I would find that annoying and disconcerting shooting her gaze at me every few seconds like that
If I was sitting there in the jury I would find that annoying and disconcerting shooting her gaze at me every few seconds like that
It's weird looking as well, presumably it's to show the jury her reaction to the question, but it still looks weird answering a question by immediately facing away from the person asking it.
she's playing up to them, someone must've told her to try and connect w/ them.
i've lost count of the perjury statements she's made, and how often her lawyer has forgotten to switch her mic on. she's definitely getting her money's worth out of them, afte they tried to admit evidence several times that had already been admitted and they hacked the judge off, lol. Turd has already several times implied they're trying to string her up, by saying she supplied all injury photos that were asked for but "somehow" they were never admitted as evidence for the trial. i'm betting right now that she'll try and sue them for malpractice or something. Shawshank II: "What you in for, Turd?" "Nothing, lawyer screwed me over."
i've lost count of the perjury statements she's made, and how often her lawyer has forgotten to switch her mic on. she's definitely getting her money's worth out of them, afte they tried to admit evidence several times that had already been admitted and they hacked the judge off, lol. Turd has already several times implied they're trying to string her up, by saying she supplied all injury photos that were asked for but "somehow" they were never admitted as evidence for the trial. i'm betting right now that she'll try and sue them for malpractice or something. Shawshank II: "What you in for, Turd?" "Nothing, lawyer screwed me over."
I would just sit there and stare at her with a slightly creepy smile on my face, would make things interesting..
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 12,660
It's anecdotal but on the stream I was watching they mentioned that apparently the Jury are paying more attention to Camille and some are even rolling their eyes when Amber opens her mouth which isn't really that surprising given what we've all heard & seen
Soldato
- Joined
- 17 Aug 2003
- Posts
- 20,160
- Location
- Woburn Sand Dunes
I love how omnomnom's been trying to gaslight the forum and nobody's interested
I love how omnomnom's been trying to gaslight the forum and nobody's interested
Seems to like to chirp in every now and again with some little comment then runs off thinking "that'll get it started". Unfortunately for him\her\it the ignore function is quite handy.
The legal bytes commentary has been great. It's clear the core focus is on AH's tweet which she called a "retweet" but now changes her mind. Depp's team have two options if it ultimately boils on this for defamation - Either she knew what she was doing and because she used legal trigger wording "I Published", she take ownership of the op-ed, but if her new claim that she never knew of the article's title and just posted it without noticing, then that counts as recklessness which is also bad.
Either way that count is good news for Depp but also like the commentary says, she could still win on some technicality but as the guys they have in the courtroom have said, the jury are not buying her answers one single bit and for the first time most are actually taking notes now and some even have their jaws hanging when she gives some weird answers or are sighing/hands on face.
Either way that count is good news for Depp but also like the commentary says, she could still win on some technicality but as the guys they have in the courtroom have said, the jury are not buying her answers one single bit and for the first time most are actually taking notes now and some even have their jaws hanging when she gives some weird answers or are sighing/hands on face.