Tia Sharp

Kristoph said:
Not truly evil? Wut?
Click to expand...

XeNoN89 said:
I get what you're saying but I disagree. I think that in most cases if you are evil enough to rape a child then you are evil enough to kill a child.
Click to expand...

Its hard to explain, i think it takes a whole load more of bad/evil to look someone in the eyes and slit thier throat than it does to rape someone, if that makes sense.
 
XeNoN89 said:
They couldn't arrest him without any evidence. However they should have had a keen eye on him and not let him get away.
Click to expand...
Exactly.

You telling me with the hundred or so officers involved in the search, they couldn't assign a couple to keep surveillance on the suspect of this "tactical" interrogation.

Please. There were no tactics whatsoever.
 
Last edited:
Makes sense actually, give him an opportunity to make a statement under pressure and see if he messes up. Much easier than an interrogation.
 
asim18 said:
What?

If this was a "tactic" then why is he not already in custody?


I think you need to do just that. ;) The words "police" and "tactic" shouldn't be seen in the same sentence lol.
Click to expand...

Because it hard to keep someone in custody until you know what to charge them with.
 
asim18 said:
What?

If this was a "tactic" then why is he not already in custody?


I think you need to do just that. ;) The words "police" and "tactic" shouldn't be seen in the same sentence lol.
Click to expand...

In the interview they say he'd been under house arrest for a week.

Obviously their initial searches weren't great! (no ****)

But I presume with no firm evidence there's limits or pressures on the time they can have him under house arrest.
 
Kristoph said:
In the interview they say he'd been under house arrest for a week.

Obviously their initial searches weren't great! (no ****)

But I presume with no firm evidence there's limits or pressures on the time they can have him under house arrest.
Click to expand...

He said it was basically like being under house arrest with all the media outside making accusations.

I don't think he was actually under house arrest because there is various footage of him walking around in that crap t-shirt.

As he was basically saying the press had it in for him making accusations is probably why the police didn't push it too much without hard evidence against him. That doesn't take away from the fact that they all should have been under suspicion from the start.

As soon as you heard the words ALONE and BOYFRIEND it was pretty obvious he should have been watched like a hawk until he was proven innocent.

Grandmother's boyfriend - check
Looks like a crackhead - check
Last person to see her - check
No CCTV of her going to Croydon - check
Hazell only getting flustered and emotional when questioned about being involved - check

I think it's a case of she's alone in the house with him, Grandmothers at work, he tries it on probably ****ed or on some some of drugs and she resists, he goes too far and realises he's either got to kill her or be outed as a paedo in the local community.

He shouldn't have been left alone to do a quick one, in fact how the **** has he been able to leave the house in the first place with most of the daily rags outside?
 
Last edited:
Exactly. The police do use the interview and plea tactic. It;s common knowledge.

If a family member of mine disappeared and the police wanted me to the appeal/interview I know know straight away I was their prime suspect.

It's much easier for somebody to slip up on camera to an interview than being at the police station with is brief advising him

It's like the police get a couple of free interrogations with their suspect before they arrest him. They still need evidence even if they do suspect the person.
 
G|mp said:
He said it was basically like being under house arrest with all the media outside making accusations.

I don't think he was actually under house arrest because there is various footage of him walking around in that crap t-shirt.

As he was basically saying the press had it in for him making accusations is probably why the police didn't push it too much without hard evidence against him. That doesn't take away from the fact that they all should have been under suspicion from the start.

As soon as you heard the words ALONE and BOYFRIEND it was pretty obvious he should have been watched like a hawk until he was proven innocent.

Grandmother's boyfriend - check
Looks like a crackhead - check
Last person to see her - check
No CCTV of her going to Croydon - check
Hazell only getting flustered and emotional when questioned about being involved - check

He shouldn't have been left alone to do a quick one, in fact how the **** has been able to leave the house in the first place with most of the daily rags outside?
Click to expand...

^ Stupid Police.
 
G|mp said:
He said it was basically like being under house arrest with all the media outside making accusations.

I don't think he was actually under house arrest because there is various footage of him walking around in that crap t-shirt.

As he was basically saying the press had it in for him making accusations is probably why the police didn't push it too much without hard evidence against him. That doesn't take away from the fact that they all should have been under suspicion from the start.

As soon as you heard the words ALONE and BOYFRIEND it was pretty obvious he should have been watched like a hawk until he was proven innocent.

Grandmother's boyfriend - check
Looks like a crackhead - check
Last person to see her - check
No CCTV of her going to Croydon - check
Hazell only getting flustered and emotional when questioned about being involved - check

I think it's a case of she's alone in the house with him, Grandmothers at work, he tries it on probably ****ed or on some some of drugs and she resists, he goes too far and realises he's either got to kill her or be outed as a paedo in the local community.

He shouldn't have been left alone to do a quick one, in fact how the **** has he been able to leave the house in the first place with most of the daily rags outside?
Click to expand...

sounds like they should have arrested him and kept him for as long as it took to find her body, I bet hes long gone or trying to leave the country by now!
 
Greebo said:
Exactly. The police do use the interview and plea tactic. It;s common knowledge.

If a family member of mine disappeared and the police wanted me to the appeal/interview I know know straight away I was their prime suspect.

It's much easier for somebody to slip up on camera to an interview than being at the police station with is brief advising him

It's like the police get a couple of free interrogations with their suspect before they arrest him. They still need evidence even if they do suspect the person.
Click to expand...

Aye, they will always put someone in front of the media in the hope that they give something away, different pressure being in front of the media having to make a statement about someone you know you've just killed and keeping it together enough that you come across as innocent.

I said it before but he looked far too relaxed about the whole thing when interviewed, where as most normal human beings wouldn't want a camera in their face if that was happening to them, in fact it's the last thing you would want to do.

HE did to prove his innocence and put his side across, why would you want to do that if you had nothing to hide?

Like Huntley before him, he ****ed up because he was far too calm about everything.
 
lolpoliceincompetance

Reminds me of the time they decided to set up a single file queue outside our college and were stopping and searching every student one by one.

I mean really? Did they think anyone would be stupid enough to queue up to their own doom?

"Yeah, let's make all decent students late to their lessons, while the real drug dealers see us a mile away and just bunk off"

Silly police.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom