• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Time Spy Standard DX 12 Bench.

Wouldn't it make more sense to sort them by graphics score, being this is the graphics sub forum? It would certainly make judging graphics performance of each GPU (and even clock speed) a lot clearer.

It seems while the CPU score doesn't sway the overall result too heavily, it is enough to put a lower scoring card above that of a faster one (e.g AMDMatts OC RX480 beating the faster Fury Pro's).
 
sqwerty said:
Wouldn't it make more sense to sort them by graphics score, being this is the graphics sub forum? It would certainly make judging graphics performance of each GPU (and even clock speed) a lot clearer.

It seems while the CPU score doesn't sway the overall result too heavily, it is enough to put a lower scoring card above that of a faster one (e.g AMDMatts OC RX480 beating the faster Fury Pro's).
Click to expand...

I have said this several times but he keeps saying "thats why i add the GPU scores" :p

Which is great but you still end up with a situation where someone with a faster CPU ends up higher on the board than someone with a faster GPU.

I think its a case of; 3DMark benchmark threads have been laid out like since day one all over the internet and its too late to change it, its done now.

Tho some reviewers have started to realise the idiocity of using the overall score on their slides and switched to using the GPU score when reviewing the GPU.
 
SouthEastBlue said:
Curious if the CPU has any positive or negative affect on the Graphics score at all? If it does then maybe keeping it the way it is is correct, otherwise I agree Graphics score is normally what we're looking at.
Click to expand...

If you look at the GPU scores of those with slower CPU's and compare them to those with faster CPU's one would have to conclude it doesn't make any difference.

Tho perhaps in 'extremely' unbalanced systems it might.
 
SouthEastBlue said:
Curious if the CPU has any positive or negative affect on the Graphics score at all? If it does then maybe keeping it the way it is is correct, otherwise I agree Graphics score is normally what we're looking at.
Click to expand...

Given how small cpu usage actual graphics tests have, you will run in cpu problems on very unbalanced setups or SLI / CF configurations with high end cards.
 
1070 in sli on a 1440p monitor

5930k at stock 3.5ghz

drivers 368.69

mine is:

SCORE 8985 with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070(2x) and Intel Core i7-5930K

Graphics Score 10036
CPU Score 5641

or

3DMark Score8985
Graphics Score10036
CPU Score5641
Graphics Test 165.75 fps
Graphics Test 257.28 fps
CPU Test18.95 fps


http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9296529
 
hobib_ali said:
1070 in sli on a 1440p monitor

5930k at stock 3.5ghz

drivers 368.69

mine is:

SCORE 8985 with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070(2x) and Intel Core i7-5930K

Graphics Score 10036
CPU Score 5641

or

3DMark Score8985
Graphics Score10036
CPU Score5641
Graphics Test 165.75 fps
Graphics Test 257.28 fps
CPU Test18.95 fps


http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9296529
Click to expand...

Wrong thread.
 
sqwerty said:
Wouldn't it make more sense to sort them by graphics score, being this is the graphics sub forum? It would certainly make judging graphics performance of each GPU (and even clock speed) a lot clearer.

It seems while the CPU score doesn't sway the overall result too heavily, it is enough to put a lower scoring card above that of a faster one (e.g AMDMatts OC RX480 beating the faster Fury Pro's).
Click to expand...
A DX12 benchmark should absolutely include CPU score as that's far more relevant for what DX12 does than focusing just on the GPU aspect.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom