Kaiju said:I don't quite understand why Company of Heroes is one of the best graphically enhanced games on the PC. Maybe someone would care to enlighten me?
I just played the demo and the graphics are mediocre at best when set on high detail with AA/AF. For an RTS, I can see why it's got a high accolade due to it's stellar gameplay, but to be honest I just don't see how it's pushing any graphical boundaries.
Kaiju said:I don't quite understand why Company of Heroes is one of the best graphically enhanced games on the PC. Maybe someone would care to enlighten me?
I just played the demo and the graphics are mediocre at best when set on high detail with AA/AF. For an RTS, I can see why it's got a high accolade due to it's stellar gameplay, but to be honest I just don't see how it's pushing any graphical boundaries.
You said it yourself, you were somewhat surprised to pick it. I could probably name you 50 games, sure, but to be honest, I don't think i've played 50 games on the PC.HangTime said:It was a somewhat suprising decision for myself to pick it actually, but it really is very impressive. The explosions from artillery in particular are exceptional and I think to fully appreciate the graphics you need to view the action from some non-default angles (such as in the cutscenes).
If you genuinely think the graphics are mediocre on high (ultra?) then I'd love to know a list of games you consider superior (say 50 games). I can understand people not having it in their top3 or even top10 depending on their tastes and what they've played, but I'd certainly rate it above average never mind mediocre.
Kaiju said:You said it yourself, you were somewhat surprised to pick it. I could probably name you 50 games, sure, but to be honest, I don't think i've played 50 games on the PC.![]()
The graphics are simply mediocre in comparision to games like FEAR, HL2, etc.
Kaiju said:You said it yourself, you were somewhat surprised to pick it. I could probably name you 50 games, sure, but to be honest, I don't think i've played 50 games on the PC.![]()
The graphics are simply mediocre in comparision to games like FEAR, HL2, etc.
As an RTS it is stunning, sure, but as this thread is based on the whole market of PC games, the whole point of this thread is to compare it to other games.Hedge said:Its an RTS, for a game of its genre the graphics are stunning. Judge it for what it is, dont compare it to source or fear.
On the contrary, they have amazing graphics.HangTime said:FEAR and HL2 both have good graphics...
We will have to agree to disagree hombre. This isn't a question of who is right and who is wrong.HangTime said:I can understand they may be more to some people's tastes, but I certainly wouldn't rate CoH as 'mediocre' next to it.
I don't see how you can state I have limited experience of the market, when you are basing that on a figure below 50 games. I've played well above 20, including all the recent FPS and graphical stunners i.e. FEAR, Quake 4, HL2, COD2, BF2142, i could go on.HangTime said:Maybe having played so few PC games has limited your experience of the market as a whole meaning that you don't have much perspective of what an average PC game looks like.
That screenshot looks great, but the game is nowhere like that throughout. Again, in my view I simply find the models, shaders lacking and that's because the game sometimes requires a mass of units on screen at any one time. That's why the graphics aren't on par with an FPS like HL2 in my view.HangTime said:Take a look at stuff like this :http://media2.playstadium.dk/img/marty/companyofheroes/1.jpg
Now I'm sure we could all find flaws in that image but the same can be said for pretty much any game.