Kaiju said:We will have to agree to disagree hombre. This isn't a question of who is right and who is wrong.![]()
Fair enough - as previously stated I can understand if people don't rate CoH as having amazing graphics, it's more the use of the word 'mediocre' that I take issue with. Maybe we just have different ideas of what the word means

Well... FEAR or HL2 doesn't look impressive all the time either. For example I'd say that some of the office environments (FEAR) and citadel environments (HL2) aren't anything special graphically - very bland.That screenshot looks great, but the game is nowhere like that throughout.
In my view part of being graphically impressive includes having a lot going on at once. I mean I'm sure if we limited a game to solely one enemy at a time we could really bump up the detail, but that would be somewhat counterproductive.Again, in my view I simply find the models, shaders lacking and that's because the game sometimes requires a mass of units on screen at any one time. That's why the graphics aren't on par with an FPS like HL2 in my view.
It's simply not capable within the RTS field at this time. If you wish to base your view on it's graphics within the RTS category, that's up to you.
Not at all - I listed it alongside a FPS and an RPG in my list of 3. The fact that I stated my suprise at it's inclusion just goes to illustrate that it has really stepped out from it's RTS pigeon hole and has acheived acclaim in it's own right.